SKEMA Business School vs Hult International Business School vs Mount Holyoke College vs Huntington University vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 256 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry relevance and practical skills
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Career opportunities and personal development
- +Strong career services and networking opportunities
- +Practical, hands-on learning with experienced faculty
- +Diverse international environment and global alumni network
- +Welcoming and supportive community
- +Dedicated and engaged faculty
- +Rich academic opportunities
- +Inclusive and supportive campus environment
- +Engaging extracurriculars and personal development opportunities
- +High-quality teaching and student well-being support
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Engaging and enjoyable learning experience
- +Realistic projects and experienced tutors
- +Personalized and flexible learning options
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare and discriminatory practices.
- -Ineffective career guidance and problematic teaching faculty.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Facility quality and professor standards are inconsistent.
- -Admission standards are perceived as too low.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant problem.
- -Lack of academic support and unclear course expectations are disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Teaching quality is inconsistent, with some instructors lacking engagement.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
Academic and social aspects of the institution received particularly high marks, with Professors and Internationality scoring above 4.3. Facilities and Location also performed well, both exceeding 4.2. Student Life and Value were rated positively around 4.1. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, which received a score of 3.58.
This university garners impressive scores, particularly in **Internationality** (4.77) and **Location** (4.58). Professors also receive high marks at 4.47. Facilities, Student Life, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.0. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, indicating a potential area for improvement.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **professors** and **internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities and value for money are also highly regarded, with scores of 4.67. Student life and accommodation are rated well at 4 and 4.33 respectively. The **location** stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Value** and **Professors**, receiving the highest marks in these areas. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also score well. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest aspect, with the lowest rating. The remaining categories, including **Location** and **Internationality**, fall within a moderate range, suggesting areas for potential development.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
This institution demonstrates a varied performance across key metrics. Its strongest areas are clearly Professors, Accomodation, and Value, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, Facilities and Student Life are identified as areas for improvement, with ratings of 3. The university also scores well in Internationality, indicating a globally engaged environment.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
~97.5% of 161 reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-oriented programs, excellent teaching, and international environments. A small ~2.5% of feedback mentions poor management and communication.
Approximately 95.4% of 65 reviews are positive, highlighting networking, job opportunities, practical learning, and supportive faculty. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with staff competence and course materials.
With an average rating of 4.67/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight a strong sense of community and supportive, engaged faculty. Academic rigor and opportunities within the Five College Consortium are also frequently praised.
All eight reviews are positive, averaging 4.13/5 stars. Students highlight diversity, well-organized extracurriculars, and a supportive learning environment with skilled professors and counselors. No negative feedback was provided.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
All 3 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Students found the lessons engaging and realistic, with experienced tutors and practical projects contributing to a positive learning experience.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
One of my favourite aspects about Hult is its diversity. By meeting people from all over the world with diverse histories and customs, you can get a sense of what their home nations are like. I also enjoy the help the staff provides every step of the way.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
I liked how there was a quick questionnaire during onboarding to personalize my experience. In my case, I did the course to see if the subject matter was the right one for me, as I do not have a technical background. I could choose to study around my schedule or to follow a disciplined program, which is what I need sometimes to help with motivation levels. Maybe a short course on its own is not enough to start working in this field, but I enjoyed the process and hope to be able to work on some different projects at my current job in the future, or at the very least, communicate with our dev team a bit better.
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
