Student review [#92819] for Business Administration
at University of Amsterdam - UvA

For European students, the University of Amsterdam offers a strong value proposition. Tuition fees are relatively low compared to many other European institutions, and certain programs are well-regarded academically. However, the quality of programs is inconsistent; while some live up to expectations, others fall short in terms of rigor, support, and overall structure.

For international students, the experience can be far more challenging. Tuition fees are significantly higher, often totaling around €30,000 for a three-year bachelor’s program, which represents a major financial commitment. Unfortunately, the university does not appear to adequately acknowledge or accommodate the specific challenges international students face.

A major concern lies with the examination board and its treatment of students in exceptional circumstances. There are documented cases where students who experienced serious medical issues or the loss of a family member were not granted proper consideration. In such situations, it is unreasonable to expect students to perform at their best, yet the board often dismisses these factors and treats failed exams—even under extreme conditions—as legitimate grounds for expulsion from the program. This policy applies equally harshly to students in their final years of study as it does to those in their first year, which can result in years of work and significant financial investment being lost in an instant.

Universities have a responsibility not only to maintain academic standards but also to show compassion and understanding toward their students, especially when life circumstances clearly affect performance. The rigid and unsympathetic approach of the examination board undermines this responsibility. If the purpose of such committees is to evaluate fairly whether students are capable of continuing their studies, then fairness must also include a genuine consideration of personal circumstances. Without this, the process risks becoming punitive rather than supportive.