Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México - UAEMex (reviews)

My experience with my classmates was very positive; I have nothing negative to say about it. There was always an atmosphere of respect, collaboration, and mutual support, which made the academic process more manageable and enriched learning through the exchange of ideas and experiences.
However, the educational programs left much to be desired. In many respects, the content, teaching methods, and tools used seem outdated compared to the demands of today’s world. We live in a technological reality that is advancing at a much faster pace than university education, and this gap is becoming increasingly evident.
I believe universities will have to fundamentally rethink and transform their teaching methods, incorporating innovation, continuous updating, and more flexible and practical models. Otherwise, they risk becoming outdated institutions, valued only for tradition, but increasingly less relevant to new generations and the real demands of society.

From my perspective, UAEMéx offers a wide range of academic programs, allowing students from different fields to find opportunities for professional growth. I also think the university places a strong emphasis on research and social responsibility, which is essential in today’s academic environment. This is particularly important because universities should not only focus on knowledge, but also on contributing to society.
Another important aspect is the role of professors. In many cases, they are knowledgeable and experienced, which contributes positively to the learning environment. Their guidance can be especially valuable for students interested in research or pursuing advanced studies. However, as in many large institutions, the quality of teaching may vary depending on the program or faculty.

Good university, overall good professors and nice programs but the structure is not the best and needs an update fot better safety
It’s safe to be in there and you can enjoy your experience while learning

I liked the curriculum, as well as the teachers; most of them were well-trained in teaching.

I didn’t like that there were very few extracurricular activities.

Much of the infrastructure was very poor, even though capital and government revenue was not bad.
I suppose there were problems with the rector. It’s not for nothing that a student strike was recently held to elect a new rector.