Universidad del Cono Sur de las Américas - UCSA vs Universidad Nacional de Asunción - UNA vs Universidad Católica Nuestra Señora de la Asunción - UC vs Universidad Autónoma de Asunción - UAA vs Universidad Columbia del Paraguay

Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Columbia del Paraguay (5.00)
Universidad del Cono Sur de las Américas - UCSA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Nacional de Asunción - UNA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Católica Nuestra Señora de la Asunción - UC: wins 3/6 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Asunción - UAA: wins 2/6 categories
Universidad Columbia del Paraguay: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad de la Integración de las Américas - UNIDA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad del Pacífico Privada - UP: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Forensic Psychology
Best programme: Art and Design
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.33
4.00
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.33
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
3.33
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
3.33
4.50
Win
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
Not rated
3.67
4.50
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
2.67
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Career preparation and professional training
  • +Teacher guidance and mentorship
  • +Community engagement and social impact
  • +Excellent, professional, and highly qualified faculty.
  • +Strong theoretical foundation and demanding curriculum.
  • +Well-equipped facilities and up-to-date resources.

Nothing to show

  • +Leading tourism programs
  • +Strong career preparation
  • +Positive reputation for specific fields

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Communication and transparency regarding academic matters are frequently lacking.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured by many.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This university presents a strong profile, with outstanding marks in **Location** (4.33) and solid ratings for **Professors** (4) and **Value** (3.67). Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score (2.67). **Facilities** and **Student Life** are rated moderately at 3.33, with **Internationality** also scoring similarly.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.5. It also scores well in **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value**, each earning a 4. The sole area showing a comparative weakness is **Accomodation**, which received a rating of 3.

Nothing to show

Across multiple assessed areas, this institution demonstrates a remarkably consistent and positive performance. Its strongest and weakest areas are indistinguishable, with facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all receiving a solid rating of 4. This suggests a well-rounded educational experience where no single aspect significantly outshines or lags behind the others.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Reviews are largely positive, highlighting strong professional training and guidance leading to career success. Some mention the public, government-funded nature and volunteering programs. No negative reviews were provided.

University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100% of reviews). Students highlight excellent classes and highly qualified professors who provide a solid theoretical foundation. A minor theme noted is a perceived lack of practical application in some programs.

Nothing to show

With a single review, this university received a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback was overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of it recommending the institution, specifically highlighting its tourism program. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
25%
33%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
0%
25%
67%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
50%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close