Indian Institute of Management Calcutta - IIMC vs Neapolis University Pafos vs Indian Institute of Technology Madras vs An-Najah National University vs SUNY Empire State
Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Exceptional education and practical learning experiences
- +Strong industry connections and placement opportunities
- +Prestigious reputation and high-quality faculty
- +Strong professional experience and helpful professors
- +Diverse international student community
- +Excellent professors and industry-relevant curriculum
- +High-quality research facilities and opportunities
- +Strong academic reputation and campus environment
- +Knowledgeable and accessible professors
- +Strong academic programs and resources
- +Hands-on learning opportunities
- +Accessible, flexible remote learning options
- +Supportive and responsive professors
- +Personalized learning and goal-setting support
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Limited career support and unclear future prospects are a significant concern.
- -Unfair and suspicious grading system, particularly regarding thesis evaluation.
- -Lack of transparency and truthfulness in communication from the university and supervisors.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
- -Poor administrative and management support.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
- -Course content and delivery often fail to meet expectations or relevance.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support negatively impact student experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, achieving solid ratings of 4 across facilities, professors, and location. Student life and accommodation are also viewed positively, with scores of 3 and 3.5 respectively. The university's weakest areas appear to be its internationality, receiving a 2.5 rating, and its value proposition, which also scored 3.5.
With a solid overall performance, this institution excels in several key areas. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received high marks, indicating a positive campus environment and convenient surroundings. However, the university's strongest areas are contrasted by lower scores for professors and internationality, suggesting potential room for improvement in academic support and global engagement. The value also appears to be a weaker point.
This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly excelling in its professors, location, and perceived value, all achieving a perfect 5. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded at 4.5 and 4.25 respectively. The facilities are rated highly at 4.75, while accommodation, at 4.25, represents the lowest score, though still very positive.
This institution receives its highest marks for its **Facilities**, rated at 4.33. Professors are also well-regarded with a score of 4. In contrast, **Student Life** presents the lowest score at 2.33. Other areas, including Location, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value, fall within a moderate range between 3.33 and 3.67, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its notable strengths.
Overall, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths. Student life stands out with a perfect score, alongside excellent ratings for professors and internationality. Accommodation, location, and value also receive strong marks. The facilities, while still rated positively, appear to be the relatively weakest area, though still above average.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5 and 3 out of 4 reviews being positive, students praise the prestigious education, exceptional practical learning, and strong placement opportunities. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 2/5, negative feedback (~67%) dominates. Students express dissatisfaction with the grading system, citing unfairness and suspicion. One positive comment highlights valuable professional experience and helpful professors.
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise brilliant professors, industry-relevant curriculum, excellent research facilities, and engaging technical events.
All three reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students praise knowledgeable professors, engaging courses, and ample resources. Some desire more diversity and improved training opportunities.
With a 4.67/5 average rating from 3 reviews, ~100% are positive. Students highlight professors being nice and responsive, with asynchronous remote learning being beneficial for focus and busy schedules. One suggestion mentioned more remote engagement activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I had the worst possible experience during my diploma thesis grading, plus the overall grading system works in a very suspicious way and is totally unfair. My 1st degree is from an Engineering university (5years - integrated master) thus I had high expectations which were proven to be false. Throughout the thesis process, I was repeatedly assured that everything was progressing well. My supervisor gave me the impression that my work met all expectations and that my performance was strong. However, I was surprised and disheartened to receive a final thesis grade of 8/10, which was significantly lower than my average course grades, typically around 9/10. This discrepancy brought down my final degree average to 8.6, which does not reflect the overall quality and consistency of my academic performance. In higher level universities, you are supposed to get your best grade in your best project, which is your thesis, but not on Neapolis Pafos University apparently. Regarding my work, please note that even at my presentation everyone was thrilled about my work (I also answered every question with great success as they mentioned). All 3 supervisors congratulated me and then gave me an 8. I wanted some feedback, and I tried to call my supervisor but he rejected every single one of my calls!! Hilarious. The lack of alignment between the supervisor’s feedback and the final grade raises concerns about fairness and consistency in the grading system.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
