SKEMA Business School vs Vaal University of Technology vs Cape Peninsula University of Technology - CPUT vs North-West University - NWU vs Central University of Technology, Free State - CUT
Side-by-side comparison from 666 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +International focus and diverse campus experiences
- +Practical, industry-relevant curriculum and career support
- +Strong community with great classmates and alumni network
- +Practical experience and career preparation
- +Accessible lecturers and good study facilities
- +Affordable fees and accommodation
- +Supportive and knowledgeable instructors
- +Practical, career-focused education
- +Student-centered support and safety
- +Excellent support services and helpful faculty
- +Vibrant and organized campus life with social activities
- +Beautiful campus environment conducive to study
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Practical, hands-on learning and industry connections
- +Welcoming and engaging campus environment
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers.
- +Practical learning experiences and diverse showcases.
- +Smooth and hassle-free administrative processes.
- +Flexible online programs balancing work and study
- +Supportive lecturers and practical learning experiences
- +Efficient registration and accessible study resources
- -Administrative and management issues create poor student experience.
- -Ineffective communication and guidance hinder career development.
- -Faculty and program organization are disappointing and overly focused on profit.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -- Administrative and communication issues are a significant problem.
- -- Lack of resources and outdated facilities hinder learning.
- -- Accommodation and student support services are insufficient.
- -Lack of practical experience and career preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues, with a focus on targets over academics.
- -Language barriers making academic engagement difficult.
- -Persistent accommodation problems and administrative errors with marks.
- -Overpriced tuition and fees.
- -Inadequate resources and support.
- -Poorly maintained facilities.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of support.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and equipment.
- -Limited access to essential resources and learning materials.
Across a range of metrics, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **professors** (4.41) and **internationality** (4.36). Facilities and location also received favorable scores, both above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating a generally positive experience. The weakest area is **accommodation**, which stands at 3.56, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.
A well-rounded academic experience is indicated by these university ratings. Professors received the highest marks at 4.19, closely followed by Location (4.125) and Value (4.115). Student Life and Facilities also scored well, both above 4.0. Conversely, Accomodation at 3.68 and Internationality at 3.69 represent the areas with the lowest scores.
Generally positive feedback emerges from the university's ratings, with professors and value for money receiving the highest scores at 4.08. Student life and location also score well, both at 3.8. Areas for improvement include accommodation, which received the lowest rating at 3.12, and internationality, scoring 3.43. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.63.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas. Value for money stands out with the highest rating, closely followed by excellent Facilities. Student Life and Professors also receive commendably high scores. Conversely, Accomodation presents the lowest rating among the surveyed categories, with Internationality also scoring moderately lower than the top-performing metrics.
This university scores exceptionally well in **Location (4.5)** and **Facilities (4.39)**, indicating these are its strongest aspects. Student life, professors, and value also receive solid ratings. The **Accomodation (3.72)** is the lowest-rated area, suggesting room for improvement, while Internationality also falls slightly below the average of other categories.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Value** and **Location**, both receiving excellent scores. The **Internationality** of the student body is also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area, with a significantly lower score compared to other aspects. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also present opportunities for improvement, while **Professors** are well-regarded.
This institution receives high marks in several key areas, notably excelling in **Value (4.64)** and **Location (4.3)**. **Student Life (4.2)** and **Facilities (4.11)** are also rated positively. However, **Accomodation (3.17)** stands out as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement in student living arrangements. Other categories like Professors and Internationality also received solid, above average scores.
The vast majority (~97%) of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and strong alumni networks. A small percentage (~3%) express concerns about management, communication, and organization.
Students express strong satisfaction, with ~74% giving high ratings. Recurring positive themes include preparation for the work environment, accessible lecturers, and a positive campus experience. No negative feedback was recorded.
Around ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good instructors and practical, career-focused education. Negative feedback (~9.8%) mentions issues with academic records, accommodation shortages, and some safety concerns.
With a 4.37/5 average rating from 414 reviews, nearly all feedback is positive, highlighting beautiful campuses, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. Very minimal negative feedback exists.
With a 4.3/5 average rating and ~85% positive feedback, students praise hands-on learning, supportive lecturers, and engaging campus life. A small amount of feedback (~5%) mentioned issues with online registration and accommodation.
With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~74% of reviews are positive, praising lecturer support, practical experience, and a smooth administrative process. There is no negative feedback.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praised flexible online programs, responsiveness, and practical course content preparation for the workforce.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
It was a good institution but they didn’t take care of their students who were doing well in other institutions students who were doing were given the bursaries.i felt that the university didn’t take good care of their students
The e-learning center being open 24/7 really help me when wi-fi was inaccessible in my residents. This really help me to work in a quiet environment that's filled with like minded students. Highly recommend this institution!
NWU helps unlock students potentials. I came here as a shy person, in less than 2 years I'm a completely different person . More confidence, I am more focused , more motivated and so much more .it's a worthwhile experience being here .
It's actually a nice university, it has more opportunities and usually give their students experience that they are gonna need in their professional field. I like almost everything about it ,the events and activities provided to learners 😊. Our lectures are very friendly and real good when it comes to doing their job and they offer more study materials for learners to be able to understand their work.
I attended Stadio with hesitance - I had really been hoping to attend a more mainstream university like WITS or UJ - but I got all that and more with Stadio. The lecturers are the best, nothing compares to their intellect and interest in their respective fields. There are, admittedly, certain issues with admin (it may be an uncommon issue) But, like I said - excellent lecturers, great quality content to learn, and simply an overall enjoyable experience to be able to attend Stadio.
Nothing to show
