SKEMA Business School vs University of the People - UoPeople vs University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign vs Schiller International University vs Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences - MCPHS
Side-by-side comparison from 3,219 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +strong international exposure & opportunities
- +practical and relevant program curriculum & skills
- +valuable alumni network & career support
- +Flexible and affordable online learning
- +Diverse international student community
- +Engaging coursework and practical insights
- +Excellent, caring professors and strong STEM/engineering programs
- +Abundant social life, campus activities, and student organizations
- +Practical, flexible learning opportunities and undergraduate research
- +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
- +Practical experience and career advancement support
Nothing to show
- +Academic excellence and holistic development
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Welcoming environment and quality facilities
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare, with concerns about teaching quality and discrimination.
- -Ineffective career guidance and support for students.
- -Data security concerns and administrative issues.
- -Unexpected and high mandatory exam fees.
- -Difficult to navigate online learning platforms and lack of community support.
- -Toxic academic environment and abusive faculty behavior.
- -Pervasive issues with racism and sexism.
- -Insufficient support and inability of good staff to enact change.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
- -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
- -Students frequently cite poor communication and disorganization from staff.
- -A lack of responsiveness and support from faculty is a recurring issue.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors and internationality stand out as particularly strong aspects, receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also rated positively. However, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Value for money is also a solid, though not exceptional, performer in this rating overview.
This institution receives outstanding marks for Internationality (4.83) and Professors (4.74), indicating significant strengths in global presence and faculty quality. Value for money (4.79) also scores exceptionally high. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area with a rating of 2.90. Facilities (3.43), Student Life (3.64), and Location (3.35) fall within a moderate range.
This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.63) and **Professors** (4.52). **Value** (4.57) and **Accomodation** (4.29) also received strong scores. Conversely, **Location** (3.42) stands out as the area with the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects.
Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.
Nothing to show
Remarkably strong scores define the university's profile. Facilities, professors, and student life all achieved an outstanding 4.75, while location and accommodation also garnered excellent ratings. The sole area for potential improvement lies in internationality, which registered at 3.5. Overall, the institution offers a compelling value proposition, indicated by a solid 4.
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and helpful alumni networks. A small percentage (around 3%) cite issues with management, communication, and organization.
~99.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting flexibility, affordability, and a diverse global community. Negative feedback, representing ~0.4%, mentions navigation issues and data breaches.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~95%), with students praising excellent professors and abundant social and research opportunities. A small minority (~5%) cited issues within specific departments.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.
Nothing to show
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise academic excellence, faculty passion, and a welcoming, diverse environment. Facilities and resources are also highlighted positively.
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
“University of the People is helping me translate a long history of practical experience into a formal foundation,” he says. “Most importantly, it is helping me prove to myself that persistence, when paired with structure, can turn even difficult chapters into a hopeful future.”
Nothing to show
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
