Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Centria University of Applied Sciences vs University of Oulu - OY vs University of Turku
Side-by-side comparison from 84 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible and multidisciplinary learning
- +Strong foundational and independent learning
- +Supportive community and active student life
- +Dedicated, supportive, and passionate faculty
- +Well-organized, modern campus and facilities
- +Strong industry connections and practical, future-focused education
- +Supportive professors and practical learning
- +Global opportunities and accessible location
- +Personal development and useful knowledge acquisition
- +High-quality education and strong programs, especially in ICT and wireless technology.
- +Supportive and international learning environment with modern facilities.
- +Good city life, student culture, and career preparation support.
- +Approachable professors & strong academic programs
- +Welcoming city & positive student community
- +Good accommodation & proximity to campus
- +Industry connection and practical experience
- +Relevant, real-world focused curriculum
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and poor curriculum design lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and disorganized management plague student experiences.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create a frustrating learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff leads to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of essential resources and support negatively impacts student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common source of dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of effective teaching and engaging curriculum is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a persistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring complaint.
Nothing to show
This university receives strong commendations, particularly for its **Student Life** and **Facilities**, both scoring above 4.5. **Accomodation** and **Value** are also highly rated, each at 4.39. **Professors** represent the lowest-scoring area, though still rated positively. The university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with notable strengths in its campus environment and student experience.
This institution garners exceptional scores, with Professors receiving the highest marks at 4.92 and Facilities a very close second at 4.8. Student Life and Location also scored highly, both above 4.5. The weakest area, though still strong, is Accomodation with a rating of 4.44. Internationality and Value are tied for the second-highest scores.
Overall, this institution garners strong marks, with accommodation and value standing out as exceptional strengths, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality are all rated highly, demonstrating a consistently positive experience across these key aspects.
This institution excels significantly in its **Facilities** and **Value**, both receiving near-perfect scores. **Accomodation** is also a strong point. Conversely, the **Location** is the weakest area, indicating potential drawbacks in this aspect. **Student Life** and **Internationality** show moderate performance, suggesting room for improvement in fostering a vibrant campus experience and a more global outlook.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings across several key areas. Facilities and professors are particularly well-regarded, both receiving 4.25. Internationality is also a positive, scoring a 4. Value for money is also strong at 4.125. The weakest areas appear to be student life (3.71) and location and accommodation, both rated at 3.875.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **internationality**, achieving a perfect score, and its **facilities**, **professors**, and **accommodation**, all receiving high marks. Conversely, the **location** stands out as its weakest area, indicated by a lower rating. Student life and overall value are rated respectably in the middle tier.
Nothing to show
Students highly recommend the university, praising its multidisciplinary courses and freedom to study outside their major (~90%). Positive feedback highlights independent learning, excellent facilities, and strong community support, with no reported negative reviews.
With a 4.89/5 average rating from 27 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight great professors, international focus, and excellent organization. Positive themes include modern facilities and strong industry connections.
With a 4/5 average rating and no negative feedback (~0%), students praise freedom to develop, practical learning, and supportive professors. The university's global network and accessible location with affordable accommodation are also highlighted.
All 7 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the high-quality education, excellent facilities, and supportive, international environment, particularly in ICT and health tech. No negative feedback was reported.
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise well-structured programs, approachable professors, and a strong sense of community. The city of Turku is also frequently mentioned as a positive aspect.
This single review offers a positive perspective, highlighting strong industry connections and relevant, real-world focused coursework. The average rating is 4/5, with 100% of feedback being positive.
Nothing to show
I graduated from Aalto University's School of Business, majoring in Marketing, and I'd genuinely recommend it. What made the biggest difference for me, though, was the freedom to take courses outside my own major. I ended up mixing in some technology and design courses with my marketing courses, and that has turned out to be one of the most useful parts of my degree.
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
Centria UAS is a good university where students feel free to develop themselves and learn useful knowledge. The school has a broad Erasmus network and other partners around the world. Professors at Centria are qualified and enthusiastic in their lectures. They are always willing to help and encourage students in any problems. The theory is practically applied in every lesson via teamwork, presentations, and assignments. Cheap accommodation and easy to access to the school due to a good location. Staff are very friendly, helpful and polite. I have enjoyed a great time at Centria and went on a Double degree exchange program in France which would be obviously a great opportunity for my career prospects. About Kokkola, it is a small town with all warmhearted and helpful people. I always feel safe when staying here. This place is like my second home.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
