Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Colegio Iberoamericano Barnard - CIB vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 74 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable professors
- +Relevant, industry-tailored programs and academic excellence
- +Strong sense of community and comprehensive student development
- +Leadership and values development
- +Academic excellence and practical application
- +Supportive community and modern facilities
Nothing to show
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- +Excellent teachers and well-maintained facilities
- +Flexible scheduling and convenient location options
- +User-friendly platform and diverse payment choices
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent disruptions.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are common frustrations.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Inefficient administrative and management practices cause frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Student Life** also stands out with a high rating. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weaker areas, scoring the lowest. Other aspects like Professors, Location, and Internationality are rated favorably, indicating a well-rounded experience with specific areas for potential improvement.
This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.
Nothing to show
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
Nothing to show
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This university's facilities stand out with an excellent rating of 4.5. Professors and student life also received solid scores of 4. Areas like location and accommodation are rated favorably at 4. The university's internationality and value propositions are its weakest points, both scoring 3.5.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~83%), with students praising excellent teachers, good facilities, and comprehensive study programs. A small amount of feedback (~17%) indicated minor issues with bathrooms.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise good teachers, functional facilities, and an interactive platform. Convenient payment options and flexible schedules are also highlighted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
