BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs Birmingham – Southern College vs Bilecik University - BSEU vs Noroff School of Technology and Digital Media vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: NHH Norwegian School of Economics (4.10)
BI Norwegian Business School - BI: wins 2/7 categories
Birmingham – Southern College: wins 0/7 categories
Bilecik University - BSEU: wins 0/7 categories
Noroff School of Technology and Digital Media: wins 0/7 categories
NHH Norwegian School of Economics: wins 5/7 categories
University of Agder - uia: wins 0/7 categories
University of South-Eastern Norway: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: B.Sc. in International Business Administration
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Kristiansand, Norway
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.71
Win
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.50
Win
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
4.14
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.43
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.43
Win
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.00
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
4.29
Win
Not rated
4.00
Value
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.14
Win
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.00
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
4.71
Win
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
  • +Practical approach and industry connections
  • +Good location and food variety

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Free tuition and diverse program options
  • +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
  • +Supportive environment and welcoming community

Nothing to show

  • +strong technical and practical focus on systems
  • +sustainability and real-world application
  • +analytical thinking and problem-solving
Cons
  • -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
  • -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
  • -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsive staff are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at 4 out of 5. While professors and internationality are rated a respectable 3, these represent the weakest aspects of the university's profile. Overall, the university offers good value for students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.

Nothing to show

The program is highly rated at 4/5 stars, with ~100% positive feedback. Students appreciate the focus on modern society's power infrastructure and systems. The curriculum emphasizes technical skills, analytical thinking, and practical problem-solving, particularly in sustainability.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
0%
29%
0%
0%
4★
100%
0%
0%
0%
57%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
100%
0%
14%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close