ESCP Business School vs Warsaw University of Technology vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR vs University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE
Side-by-side comparison from 127 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +European campuses and multicultural environment
- +Strong career preparation and top company recruitment
- +Development of interpersonal and managerial skills
- +Excellent, passionate, and expert faculty
- +Engaging and challenging academic programs
- +Practical, hands-on education with industry relevance
- +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Well-organized and relevant programs
- +Positive learning environment and resources
- +High-quality teaching and respected professors
- +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
- +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
- +Affordable tuition and helpful staff
- +Supportive professors and direct student contact
- +Accessible location near Warsaw
- +High education level and experienced professors
- +Valuable new skills acquisition
- +Worthwhile academic decision
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Supportive staff and dedicated professors
- +Small class sizes and engaging learning opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor campus infrastructure are a recurring problem.
- -The curriculum often lacks practical application and relevance.
- -Lack of clear communication and administrative support is frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and limited resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient feedback are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Poor organization and communication among staff lead to problems.
- -Lack of adequate academic structure and support is evident.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
- -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication cause frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of communication and disregard for student concerns on crucial issues.
- -Disappointing student experience and unfulfilled expectations.
Across various aspects, this institution shows considerable strengths, particularly in **Internationality**, earning a near-perfect score. **Location** and **Value** also received very high marks. Student life and professors are rated positively, as are facilities. However, the lowest-rated category is **Accomodation**, indicating an area for potential improvement.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Professors** and **Value** also scored very highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which registered lower scores compared to other aspects. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall within a solid mid-range, indicating generally positive experiences in these domains.
This institution presents a strong academic profile, with exceptional ratings for its professors and facilities. Location and internationality also score well. Student life and accommodation represent areas with lower, though still respectable, scores compared to other aspects. The overall value for money is perceived positively, aligning with the location rating.
Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both achieving a high score of 4.5. The **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also stand out with solid marks of 4.25. While **Accomodation** receives a good rating of 4, the **Location** emerges as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.75.
This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.
This university receives strong marks, particularly for its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.3). Areas like **facilities** and **value** also score well at 4.0. The **student life** rating is solid at 3.9. The **accommodation** category presents the weakest performance with a 3.3 rating, suggesting room for improvement in student housing.
Approximately 97.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting rewarding experiences, multicultural environments, and personal/professional growth. A single negative review mentioned the EMIB program should be updated.
With a 4.23/5 average rating from 22 reviews, students praise excellent faculty and engaging programs. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting recognized technology programs and a positive learning experience.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and well-organized programs. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about program structure and course coordination.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, about 83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise affordable tuition, helpful staff, direct lecturer support, and the university's positive environment. No negative feedback was provided.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.
University reviews are largely positive (approximately 93%), with students appreciating the international environment and supportive staff. A small portion (~7%) expressed dissatisfaction regarding a canceled graduation ceremony.
To me, studying at ESCP has been a really rewarding experience. The multicultural environment helped me grow both personally and professionally. Professors are very supportive and bring real-world insights into the classroom. I rlly liked the flexibility to study in different campuses across Europe. Although some admin processes can be slow, but overall I felt well-prepared for the job market.
Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.
Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.
I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.
University is very good, coordination between students and professors is nice, work ethics is appreciable,subjects related to topic and clear whole concepts about subject and atmosphere of university is very nice.
I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate
Nothing to show
