Crandall University - CU vs University of Toronto - UofT vs University of British Columbia vs Oulton College vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris

Side-by-side comparison from 573 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.60)
Crandall University - CU: wins 0/7 categories
University of Toronto - UofT: wins 0/7 categories
University of British Columbia: wins 1/7 categories
Oulton College: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 3/7 categories
University of Moncton - UM: wins 1/7 categories
RUBIKA: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Agricultural Engineering
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Arts
Moncton, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Best programme: Business Administration Management and Marketing
Valenciennes, France
4.40
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: 2D Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
4.09
4.19
4.21
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
4.43
Location
3.89
4.37
4.46
Not rated
4.75
Win
4.67
3.14
Professors
4.29
4.14
4.10
Not rated
4.63
Win
3.67
4.29
Internationality
4.22
4.42
4.34
Not rated
4.63
4.67
Win
3.93
Student life
4.27
3.80
4.31
Win
Not rated
3.88
4.00
4.14
Value
4.25
4.24
4.08
Not rated
4.13
4.00
4.64
Win
Accommodation
4.22
3.83
3.85
Not rated
3.00
3.67
4.29
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated, accessible, and supportive faculty
  • +Welcoming environment and small class sizes
  • +Focus on experiential and hands-on learning
  • +Prestigious reputation and strong academic programs
  • +Vibrant campus life and community building
  • +Excellent networking opportunities and career development
  • +Challenging academics and rewarding workload
  • +Excellent faculty and practical learning opportunities
  • +Vibrant campus, abundant resources, and supportive environment

Nothing to show

  • +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
  • +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
  • +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
  • +Small class sizes and strong teacher connections
  • +Welcoming campus environment and diversity
  • +Numerous opportunities for involvement and growth
  • +Practical project-based learning for career readiness
  • +Supportive instructors from industry
  • +Positive school environment and student well-being focus
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues lead to understaffed services and long wait times.
  • -Teaching quality is inconsistent, with an overemphasis on research and memorization over practical learning.
  • -Lack of adequate career resources and limited opportunities hinder student advancement.
  • -Difficulty with course selection and academic support in large classes.
  • -Inconsistent professor quality and arbitrary grading practices.
  • -Challenges finding genuine connections and disappointing social scene outside of clubs.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Poor communication and administrative support.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
  • -Lack of clear communication and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Inconsistent and ineffective teaching quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Teaching quality and course content are often found to be lacking.
Rating summary
What students say

Across various aspects, the university garners strong ratings. Its professors and student life are particularly well-regarded, both scoring above 4.27. Accommodation and internationality also receive high marks. The weakest area appears to be location, with a rating of 3.89, though facilities are also relatively lower compared to other categories. Overall, the university presents a solid profile with notable strengths in academic and social experiences.

Internationality stands out as the highest-rated aspect of the university. Location and Value also received very positive scores. Conversely, Student Life registered as the lowest-rated area. Accommodations and Professors received moderate to good ratings, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional experience in these categories.

Evaluations reveal a university excelling in several key aspects. The location garners the highest score, followed closely by internationality and student life, indicating a vibrant and globally connected environment. Professors and value also receive positive, albeit slightly lower, ratings. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, suggesting room for improvement in student housing options. Facilities, while solid, are not a standout feature compared to other categories.

Nothing to show

Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.

This institution garners strong marks, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving a near-perfect 4.67. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are also well-regarded at 4.0, with **Value** also earning a solid 4.0. Areas showing the most room for growth include **Professors** and **Accommodations**, both averaging around 3.67.

Overall, this institution excels in areas concerning financial benefit and campus resources. With an impressive **4.64**, "Value" stands out as the highest-rated aspect, closely followed by "Facilities" at **4.43**. Conversely, "Location" received the lowest score at **3.14**, indicating it's the weakest area. Other strong points include "Accomodation" and "Professors," both scoring **4.29**.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~95%), highlighting instructors' dedication and accessibility, smaller class sizes, and a welcoming Christian environment. Experiential learning and strong faculty support are also frequently praised. No negative reviews were reported.

~85% of reviews are positive, highlighting prestigious academics, strong networking, and campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) cite issues with student services and teaching quality.

Over 86% of reviews praise demanding yet rewarding academics, great study spaces, and excellent resources. A small minority (~1%) mentions course selection difficulties and the struggle to connect with people.

Nothing to show

All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.

With a 3.67 average rating, ~67% of feedback is positive. Students praise small class sizes, strong teacher connections, convenient campus location, and a welcoming, diverse atmosphere with good administrative opportunities.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93% of feedback) with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students highlight excellent, industry-professional instructors, a focus on project-based learning, and supportive environments.

Rating distribution
5★
4%
37%
38%
0%
63%
0%
43%
4★
91%
48%
50%
0%
38%
67%
50%
3★
5%
13%
12%
0%
0%
33%
7%
2★
0%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Valuable lessons I’ve learned

One of the things I would most like to discuss is Crandall University's instructors' willingness to go above and beyond to help us succeed. They are always accessible to answer our questions and provide us with wise counsel, whether it is during office hours, online, or even after class. Their dedication to our academic growth is tremendously motivating. They create a friendly environment in the classroom where children feel comfortable sharing their thoughts and asking for help. This not only fosters a sense of belonging and community, but it also facilitates meaningful conversations and peer learning.

PhD Psyc

The program itself is great and really prepares you for an academic career, but the quality of the supervisors varies a lot. Some people in the department are excellent and enjoy empowering their students, but the majority of profs make you feel like they're doing you a favour by giving you their time of day/guidance. Might be an issue exclusively with this department, but still. And the campus is cool! Great cheap eats around. Shout out to El Rey for when you want to splurge a bit and get some awesome tacos!

Underwhelming

I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close