Chernihiv National University of Technology vs Mataram University - Unram vs Assam University vs Zhejiang University - ZJU vs Schellhammer Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Qualified and professional teachers
- +Good academic knowledge and reputation
- +Hostel accommodation and extracurricular activities
- +Diverse and complete study programs
- +Improved facilities and infrastructure
- +Strong graduate employability
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and encouraging teachers.
- +Rigorous academics and personal growth opportunities.
- +Vibrant international community and appealing campus environment.
- +International environment and diverse professors
- +Attractive location and lifestyle
- +Engaging lectures and beneficial academic programs
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Excessive administrative burdens and unclear management communication.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Inflexible curriculum and limited academic support.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -The facilities are outdated and in need of renovation.
- -The quality of teaching and curriculum is disappointing.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a recurring problem.
- -Inconsistent and poor quality of instruction is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues lead to inconsistent practices and poor communication.
- -Lack of accreditation and recognition invalidates degrees and wastes money.
- -Unreliable course delivery and abrupt program changes disregard student efforts.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution presents a uniform performance across all assessed domains. With zero ratings in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no discernibly stronger or weaker areas. The university exhibits a consistent level of feedback in every category provided.
Overall, this institution receives excellent marks in several key areas, with Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all rated a strong 4.5. Internationality and Value are also highly regarded at 4 and 4 respectively. The most significant weakness identified is its Location, which received a score of 0.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving top marks. **Facilities** also score highly. Conversely, **Internationality** emerges as the weakest area of assessment. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** all received solid, though not exceptional, ratings, indicating a generally positive overall experience.
Analysis of university ratings reveals a varied picture. The institution excels in **Internationality**, receiving a strong 2.89. Conversely, **Value** is the weakest area, scoring a low 1.67. Other aspects, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation, fall within a similar moderate range, generally around the 2.0 mark.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight qualified and professional teachers, good knowledge acquisition, and a promising reputation. Some suggest updating outdated programs.
With an average rating of 3.6/5, university reviews are predominantly positive (~60%). Students appreciate the diverse study programs and career prospects. A small amount of negative feedback (~20%) points to less than ideal facilities, though some improvements have been noted.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.33/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is ~67% positive. Students highlight personal growth, helpful teachers, and challenging academics. No negative reviews were provided.
Negative feedback dominates, with ~56% of reviews expressing significant dissatisfaction regarding academic recognition and inconsistent practices. Positive comments highlight location and international atmosphere.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university brands itself as the third-best in China. While the classes in English are quite good (and probably easier than those for Chinese students taught in Chinese) all the management for foreign students is very poor and does not represent that of such a prestigious university. Most relevant information, such as those related to the thesis and graduation processes are usually only shared in WeChat groups instead of via mail or a meeting. What’s more, it happens that the management and teachers do not recognize if foreign students received that information. That management is far from professional and causes a lot of unnecessary effort and frustration to us foreign students.
They market themselves as a legitimate university, but it's nothing more than a money-making scheme. I enrolled in the Master of Arts in International Relations, only to arrive and find that the entire course syllabus had been changed, without any prior notice. The new content had nothing to do with my field of study. When I confronted the administration, they brushed it off as “normal.” Only after I threatened legal action did they even pretend to care. They quickly threw together a “new” syllabus to appease me, but it was a joke. The professors ignored it entirely and taught whatever they felt like. To make matters worse, I was the only student in the program. When I asked about it, the head of studies just shrugged and said these things happen. In the second semester, two more students joined, barely enough to call it a class. Over time, we discovered that everyone was paying wildly different tuition fees. They hide this by handing out so-called "scholarships," but it’s just a pricing manipulation strategy. If you're from a wealthier country, they assume you can pay full price. Meanwhile, students from Africa were paying as little as €1,000 for the entire year, while others from Germany were charged the full €10,000+, and students from Poland or Italy somewhere in between. The "scholarship" has nothing to do with need or merit, just how much they think they can get out of you. The extra charges are endless. They claim student housing is near the school, but it’s far enough that you’re forced to pay an outrageously expensive fee for their private school bus. They find any excuse to squeeze more money out of you. The administration is a mess. Every person you speak to gives you different information about courses, events, transportation, and rules. There's zero coordination. The atmosphere is miserable. No one wants to be there, not the students, staff, nor teachers. The teachers are completely unqualified. They throw up poorly made PowerPoint presentations riddled with grammar errors, copy-pasted from textbooks, and then read them out loud. They don’t answer questions properly, they lack any mastery of the subject, and they’re totally unprepared to teach at the master's level and university level. This program didn’t challenge me, didn’t teach me, and didn’t prepare me. I learned nothing of value. If I hadn’t enrolled, I would be in the exact same place. Avoid this school at all costs.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
