Milpark Education vs Center for Creative Leadership vs STADIO vs Regenesys Business School vs Eduvos - eduvos

Side-by-side comparison from 38 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Center for Creative Leadership (5.00)
Milpark Education: wins 0/5 categories
Center for Creative Leadership: wins 3/5 categories
STADIO: wins 0/5 categories
Regenesys Business School: wins 2/5 categories
Eduvos - eduvos: wins 0/5 categories
Damelin - Damelin: wins 0/5 categories
Institute of Marketing Management: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Cape Town, South Africa
2.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Psychology of Human Resources Development
Johannesburg, South Africa
4.20
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: Education
Johannesburg, South Africa
4.60
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Johannesburg, South Africa
3.90
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: Arts and Humanities
Johannesburg, South Africa
4.70
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Johannesburg, South Africa
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
1.25
5.00
3.57
4.60
4.43
5.00
Not rated
Location
3.00
5.00
Win
4.30
4.80
4.38
4.67
Not rated
Professors
3.00
5.00
Win
3.91
4.60
4.00
4.67
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
4.00
4.00
4.80
Win
4.00
4.67
Not rated
Student life
1.25
5.00
3.20
4.25
3.93
5.00
Not rated
Value
3.00
5.00
Win
4.45
4.60
3.93
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
1.00
3.00
2.71
4.67
Win
3.46
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Exceptional flexibility for working professionals.
  • +Strong lecturer availability and support systems.
  • +Well-structured and engaging course content.
  • +Student-centered support and inclusivity
  • +Welcoming and understanding community
  • +Supportive and dedicated lecturers.
  • +Practical learning experiences and diverse showcases.
  • +Smooth and hassle-free administrative processes.
  • +Innovative programs with modern technology and effective module structures
  • +Committed faculty with real-world insights and supportive administration
  • +Global and inclusive environment fostering personal development and leadership
  • +Small class sizes and individualized lecturer support
  • +Practical, career-focused curriculum with diverse subject coverage
  • +User-friendly application and flexible, supportive learning environment
  • +Supportive learning environment and knowledgeable, approachable lecturers.
  • +High-quality, practical study materials and effective teaching methods.
  • +Excellent campus resources and student-friendly facilities.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues create confusion and unnecessary costs.
  • -The institution prioritizes financial gain over genuine student support and well-being.
  • -Exam content and assessment procedures are misleading and unfair.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
  • -Overpriced tuition and fees.
  • -Inadequate resources and support.
  • -Poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of clear communication and organization from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging course content.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support for students are prevalent complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities detract from the learning environment.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are significant problems.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution exhibits a notable disparity in its evaluated aspects. Its weakest areas, with scores of 1.25 and 1 respectively, are Facilities and Accomodation, suggesting significant room for improvement in these domains. Conversely, Location, Internationality, and Value are its strongest points, all receiving a solid rating of 3. Professors also perform moderately well at 3.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Value** and **Location**, both receiving excellent scores. The **Internationality** of the student body is also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area, with a significantly lower score compared to other aspects. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also present opportunities for improvement, while **Professors** are well-regarded.

Exceptional scores highlight this institution's strengths, particularly in **Location** and **Internationality**, both achieving 4.8. **Accommodations** also received a very high rating of 4.67. Among the surveyed areas, **Student Life** registered the lowest score at 4.25, though it remains a solid rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a consistently high level of satisfaction across its facilities, professors, and value.

This university's ratings show a strong emphasis on its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.43. **Location** also scores highly at 4.38. Conversely, **accommodation** presents as the area needing the most development, with a rating of 3.46. Student life and value are rated similarly around 3.93, while professors and internationality are solid at 4.

This institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both earning perfect scores. **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality** also receive very strong marks. However, **Accomodation** is the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. **Value** sits comfortably in the middle, indicating a generally positive overall impression.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Half of the university's reviews are negative, citing communication and application issues, as well as concerns about finances and perceived unfair grading. Positive feedback highlights flexibility and lecturer support, despite the high cost.

With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.

With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~74% of reviews are positive, praising lecturer support, practical experience, and a smooth administrative process. There is no negative feedback.

With an average rating of 4.6/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students praise modern technology, lecturer support, and engaging module structures. No negative feedback was reported.

University reviews are largely positive (~71%), with students appreciating smaller class sizes and individual lecturer support. Some mention a demanding block system and desire for improved administrative communication.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the supportive learning environment, knowledgeable and approachable lecturers, and helpful campus resources. Some minor areas for improvement were noted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
25%
100%
45%
80%
14%
67%
0%
4★
25%
0%
27%
0%
57%
33%
0%
3★
0%
0%
27%
20%
29%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Better than Most

I attended Stadio with hesitance - I had really been hoping to attend a more mainstream university like WITS or UJ - but I got all that and more with Stadio. The lecturers are the best, nothing compares to their intellect and interest in their respective fields. There are, admittedly, certain issues with admin (it may be an uncommon issue) But, like I said - excellent lecturers, great quality content to learn, and simply an overall enjoyable experience to be able to attend Stadio.

Nothing to show

Work load

Good but you have to be ready to take on a busy academic schedule, the four quarter system, means more work spaced out in smaller time frame as opposed to a traditional semester schedule. The hybrid learning model allows you to balance school and your personal life, whilst giving you the responsibility of managing your school work

Good

I can complain about the college . I did enjoyed but the need to improve there and there but hey it’s a good school. Highly recommended. You can do online , distance and face to face class. But face to face are the best

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close