Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso - UFMT vs Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas vs SKEMA Business School vs International School of Management vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 211 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Exceptional faculty and qualified professors
- +Good campus facilities and infrastructure
- +Career-boosting programs and support
- +Dedicated faculty and comprehensive curriculum
- +Strong market preparation and career opportunities
- +Well-maintained infrastructure and campus life
- +Diverse international campus options and multicultural exposure
- +Comprehensive and customizable curricula for academic and professional growth
- +Strong faculty expertise and ample career development opportunities
- +Expert professors and quality cohorts
- +Flexible learning and personalized support
- +Global exposure and networking opportunities
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Inclusive and diverse student community
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +High-quality and relevant academic programs
- +Excellent faculty and academic reputation
- +Good research and outreach programs
- -Outdated facilities and lack of research support.
- -Poor career guidance and pathway planning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact learning.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered by some students.
- -Administrative and management issues negatively impact student experience and support.
- -Poor communication and guidance from faculty hinder career aspirations.
- -Program disorganization and overwhelming course load create confusion and stress.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of student support are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary frustration.
Academic quality stands out, with professors receiving an impressive 4.625, closely followed by its advantageous location at 4.5. Conversely, internationality scored the lowest at 3.5. Other aspects like facilities, accommodation, and student life fall within a solid mid-range. The university offers good value for its offerings, indicated by a 4.125 score in that area.
Exceptional ratings for **Facilities** and **Location** highlight key strengths, both scoring 4.625. **Professors** also received a strong 4.5. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are well-regarded at 4.429 and 4.25 respectively. **Accomodation**, while still a positive score at 4.143, represents the area with the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance with these metrics.
Emerging from the data, this institution shines particularly bright in **Internationality**, scoring an impressive 4.42. Professors and Location also receive very high marks, both above 4.3. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.68, indicating potential for improvement in this aspect of student experience. Other categories, including Facilities, Student Life, and Value, are all rated positively.
This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
This institution garners impressive scores across several key areas. It shines with perfect marks for its professors and student life, and boasts high ratings in internationality, facilities, location, and accommodation. The sole area receiving a comparatively lower score, though still strong, is its overall value.
Overall, this institution demonstrates a solid performance, with notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as a weaker area, scoring a 2. The **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately at 3.
Eight out of nine reviews are positive (approximately 89%), highlighting exceptional faculty, a strong educational experience, and a good campus with great infrastructure. One review (approximately 11%) notes issues with infrastructure and career support.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, approximately 88% of reviews are positive. Students praise excellent professors, a complete curriculum, and strong market preparation. No negative feedback was provided.
The university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~90.5% of reviews being favorable. Students praise the international opportunities, comprehensive curriculum, and professional development. A small fraction (~2.4%) of negative reviews cite issues with management and communication.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlighted inclusive learning environments and supportive faculty. Excellent infrastructure and a relevant curriculum were also noted.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students praise the faculty and research programs, though some mention uneven resource allocation and infrastructure issues.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
