Politecnico di Milano vs NABA – New Academy of Fine Arts vs POLIMI Graduate School of Management vs IULM University vs European School of Economics - ESE
Side-by-side comparison from 139 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Innovative and challenging academic programs
- +Excellent organization and guidance for students
- +Strong professor quality and available resources
- +Outstanding teachers and a supportive, family-like community.
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth in a well-resourced environment.
- +An international atmosphere with diverse student interactions.
- +Innovative and forward-looking curriculum
- +Strong career development and industry connections
- +Flexible and student-friendly learning environment
- +Career-focused and interesting courses
- +Supportive professors and staff
- +Modern and well-equipped campus facilities
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
Nothing to show
- +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
- +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
- -Professors have poor teaching performance and lack of course support.
- -Grading systems and exams are arbitrary and designed to be tricky.
- -The educational approach discourages experimentation and free thinking.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support, are frequently criticized.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Excessive administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of practical application and unclear curriculum.
- -Excessive fees and unclear financial policies are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from faculty and administration are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
Offering a generally positive student experience, this institution excels in **Internationality** and **Value**, both scoring above 4.2. **Location** also garners high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest-rated aspect, while **Facilities** receive a comparatively moderate score. Professors and Student Life are rated favorably around the 4.0 mark.
This institution receives commendations across several key areas. Its strongest performance is in **Internationality**, with a rating of 4.67. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value are also highly rated, each scoring 4.33. Student Life and Accomodation are solid, both receiving a score of 4.
The university scores exceptionally well in Student Life and Internationality, both receiving perfect marks. Its Facilities and Value also stand out with strong ratings of 4.5. Professors and Location are solid at 4.0. The lowest-rated area is Accomodation, with a score of 3.5. This indicates a positive overall experience, particularly for social engagement and global integration.
This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas. Its facilities, professors, and location are all highly rated, achieving near-perfect marks. Student life and accommodation also receive positive feedback. However, internationality stands out as the weakest aspect, with a significantly lower score compared to other metrics. The overall value of the university is rated very favorably.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
Nothing to show
This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic programs, helpful administration, and good facilities. Negative feedback (~5.3%) briefly mentions some professors' teaching effectiveness and exam ambiguity.
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.38/5. Students consistently praise outstanding teachers, a supportive environment with compassionate individuals, and abundant resources, fostering personal growth and strong connections.
All reviews are positive, with students praising the program's focus on finance technology, career prospects, and the supportive, organized learning environment. The university is described as flexible and student-friendly.
All 6 reviews are positive, averaging 4.33/5 stars. Students praise the interesting courses, career opportunities, supportive staff, and good facilities. Some mention a desire for more international focus.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.
I have experienced a lot of personalities in this university, some lecturers are very rude when you ask questions, like the thought of you even being slightly confused at what theyre saying is a crime, while some are eager to answer your questions and even welcome it, all in all i personally focus on the good ones because i am here for a purpose. But if you're really sensitive and these things are what you look out for, then this might come as a shock to you.
I liked the ambiant, the friendly people, professional professors, the care of details. I had the opportunity to improve myself and find out more about me, my skills and what I'm looking for in a job.
The program offers great technological and concrete competencies of the technology applied to the financial sector. Students are highly motivated and fun to be around. The courses are highly linked to innovative and forward-looking topics and deliver great career prospects.
Nothing to show
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
