State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta - UIN vs University of Indonesia - UI vs Universitas Terbuka - UT vs Indonesian State College of Meteorology Climatology and Geophysics - STMKG vs Universitas Pertamina

Side-by-side comparison from 60 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Jakarta State University (4.70)
State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta - UIN: wins 2/7 categories
University of Indonesia - UI: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Terbuka - UT: wins 0/7 categories
Indonesian State College of Meteorology Climatology and Geophysics - STMKG: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Pertamina: wins 0/7 categories
Jakarta State Polytechnic: wins 0/7 categories
Jakarta State University: wins 5/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: English Literature
Best programme: Art and Design
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Food Industry
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
4.22
4.28
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.33
Win
Location
4.00
4.37
4.59
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Professors
4.00
4.50
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
5.00
Win
Internationality
5.00
Win
4.33
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
2.50
4.67
Student life
5.00
Win
4.42
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.67
Value
4.00
4.42
4.39
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.67
Win
Accommodation
4.00
4.14
4.13
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.67
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Integration of Islamic values with modern sciences
  • +Opportunities for personal, spiritual, and leadership growth
  • +Active student organizations and extracurricular involvement
  • +Strong academic programs and faculty expertise
  • +Opportunities for practical application and professional development
  • +Supportive community and valuable alumni network
  • +Flexible and accessible distance learning for working professionals.
  • +Well-structured academic programs with good quality materials.
  • +Supportive faculty and organized learning environment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
  • +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
  • +Improved campus facilities
  • +High-quality, career-ready graduates.
  • +Comprehensive, innovative, and practical academic programs.
  • +Excellent facilities and pleasant learning environment.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
  • -Lack of alignment between course outlines and actual class content.
  • -Substandard experience for international students.
  • -Lack of effective communication and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
Rating summary
What students say

With impressive scores in Student Life and Internationality, this institution shines. Its professors, location, accommodation, and overall value are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded experience. The weakest area, Facilities, still received a respectable score, suggesting room for improvement but not a significant detractor from the overall positive assessment.

Overall, the university receives strong ratings across multiple aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Student life and value for money are also rated very highly. The weakest area, though still positive, is accommodation. Facilities and location also score well, demonstrating a generally positive student experience.

With an exceptional score of 4.59, the university's **location** stands out as its strongest attribute. Other well-regarded areas include **facilities** (4.28) and **value** (4.39). The **accommodation** score, at 4.13, is slightly lower in comparison but still reflects a positive reception across most surveyed aspects of student experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength, with perfect scores for both its professors and location. Students also report highly positive experiences with student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. The facilities receive a solid rating, representing the only area below a 4.5, yet still indicating a strong overall offering.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is largely positive (~100% positive reviews). Students highlight a unique blend of Islamic values and modern sciences, alongside active student organizations and community involvement opportunities.

University of Indonesia receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (97%), with students praising its academic rigor, professional lecturers, and diverse opportunities for personal and professional growth. A small percentage of negative reviews mention specific program discrepancies.

With a 4.5/5 average rating and no negative feedback, students praise flexibility for working professionals and accessible, well-organized materials. ~94% of feedback is positive.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, the three reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight the university's role in preparing graduates for the workforce, comprehensive culinary arts curriculum, and good campus facilities and accessibility.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
64%
56%
0%
0%
0%
67%
4★
100%
31%
39%
0%
0%
50%
33%
3★
0%
3%
6%
0%
0%
50%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

International student office

I wouldn't recommend UI for Masters students especially for Faculty of Business. The course outlines are sexed up, but when it comes to class its opposite. If you're an international, better to find any other programs.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close