Budapest Business University - BBU vs Eötvös Loránd University - ELTE vs ESSCA School of Management vs University of Pécs vs University of Miskolc

Side-by-side comparison from 155 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Budapest Business University - BBU: wins 0/7 categories
Eötvös Loránd University - ELTE: wins 1/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
University of Pécs: wins 1/7 categories
University of Miskolc: wins 1/7 categories
Avicenna International College: wins 0/7 categories
University of Pécs Faculty of Business and Economics: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Tourism and Catering
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: International Business
Best programme: Psychology
Miskolc, Hungary
4.50
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: Environmental Engineering
Best programme: MSc Management & Leadership
Category ratings
Facilities
3.79
3.73
3.70
4.18
4.18
Not rated
4.36
Win
Location
4.05
4.63
Win
4.00
4.44
4.45
Not rated
4.57
Professors
3.89
4.07
4.20
4.14
4.27
Not rated
4.36
Win
Internationality
3.95
4.24
4.20
4.53
4.27
Not rated
4.64
Win
Student life
3.63
3.83
4.20
4.44
Win
4.27
Not rated
3.80
Value
3.89
4.12
4.00
4.26
4.09
Not rated
4.50
Win
Accommodation
3.37
3.29
3.30
4.19
4.36
Win
Not rated
4.21
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical knowledge and real-world application
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Strong student support and well-structured courses
  • +Excellent professors and clear explanations
  • +Rigorous and well-structured programs
  • +Broad and interesting academic opportunities
  • +Practical, real-world learning and international environment
  • +Supportive staff and quality teaching
  • +Engaging content and diverse student body
  • +Practical and theoretical course balance
  • +Approachable, experienced faculty
  • +Supportive, multicultural community
  • +Innovative learning environment and supportive community
  • +Internationalization and cultural diversity
  • +Accomplished faculty and top-notch facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with real-world focus
  • +Affordable, international study environment
  • +Welcoming city with good social opportunities
Cons
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Unprofessional teaching staff and language barriers.
  • -Disorganized structure and struggles with course registration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support creates confusion and dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated and irrelevant course content and teaching.
  • -Poor value for money due to high costs and ineffective curriculum.
  • -Disengaged student body focused on social activities over academics.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment create a poor learning environment.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and inefficient management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of accessible and timely support exacerbates student difficulties.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of adequate support and communication leaves students feeling unsupported.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners a strong overall rating, with Location emerging as its most celebrated aspect. Professors and Value are also highly regarded. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Student Life and Facilities are mid-range, while Internationality is also a notable strength. The university presents a generally positive picture, with distinct areas of excellence and areas for potential improvement.

This university garners high marks in several key areas, with **Location** standing out as its strongest attribute at 4.63. **Internationality** and **Value** also received very favorable scores, reflecting strengths in global appeal and perceived worth. Conversely, **Accommodations** present the weakest area, scoring notably lower than other categories. **Professors** and **Student Life** are rated positively, indicating solid performance in teaching and campus experience.

With impressive scores in several key areas, this university excels in its Professors, Student Life, and Internationality, all receiving a strong 4.2. Location and Value also garnered positive marks at 4. However, the Facilities, rated at 3.7, and Accomodation, at 3.3, represent the areas with the most room for improvement.

This institution garners excellent marks in key areas, with Internationality standing out at 4.53, closely followed by Location (4.44) and Student Life (4.44). Value for money is also highly rated at 4.26. While Facilities and Accommodations also score well (around 4.18), Professors received slightly lower, though still strong, feedback at 4.14.

This institution garners strong marks across several aspects. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by accommodation. Professors and student life also received commendable scores. While facilities and internationality performed well, the value proposition emerged as the lowest-rated category. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its physical setting and living arrangements.

Nothing to show

This university garners high marks in several key areas, with Internationality and Location being particularly strong at 4.64 and 4.57 respectively. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive excellent scores, all above 4.35. Accommodations are rated well at 4.21. Student Life, however, is the weakest area with a rating of 3.8.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical knowledge and professional, up-to-date teachers. ~9.5% of feedback indicates issues with communication and organization.

Most university student feedback (approximately 74%) is positive, highlighting rigorous programs, knowledgeable professors, and a good community. Some students noted minor administrative disorganization and issues with professors' English proficiency.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 10 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students highlight practical, international, and supportive learning environments with quality teaching and facilities. One negative review (~10%) cited relevance and cost concerns.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~91%), highlighting a strong academic foundation with a practical and theoretical balance. Professors are praised for fairness, real-world experience, and approachability, creating a dynamic learning environment. Limited on-campus job opportunities were a minor concern.

The University of Miskolc receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being highly favorable. Students praise cutting-edge labs, approachable professors, a supportive community, and internationalization. No negative feedback was noted.

Nothing to show

~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, up-to-date curricula and hands-on learning. Negative feedback, representing ~0%, was not provided.

Rating distribution
5★
29%
36%
30%
44%
55%
0%
57%
4★
29%
38%
50%
47%
36%
0%
36%
3★
33%
26%
10%
9%
9%
0%
7%
2★
5%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Dynamic environment and teachers

The environment is good and it’s multicultural The compound is really nice but a bit far(depending on the faculty) They should have a sports team because of the facilities that they have They should really consider the sports career of the university

Mixed feelings

There is a big variety of departments to choose from, including ones that are the only available ones within the country. Unfortunately on the other hand, the organization and communication of the institution was not on the level of quality that one would expect from one of the top universities in the country. Regarding the quality of education, I had very mixed experiences as there are big differences within the departments and among the professors.

Engaging

ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.

Practical Hours/ Language Barrier

My honest opinion of PECS University has evolved significantly over the years. When I first started, I faced numerous challenges, including language barriers, a lack of lecturers who spoke English, and insufficient support for learning Hungarian, especially in my department. However, Pécs listened to our complaints and made strides to improve the situation. If someone had asked me whether I would recommend Pécs while I was still there, I would have said no. However, based on what I see now, I truly believe the improvements are worth giving it a chance. The university has enhanced its resources, offered more diverse course options, and fostered a more inclusive environment. It's also important to mention that Pécs is such a peaceful and serene city, which adds to the overall experience of studying there. If the opportunity arises for me to return for a master's degree, I would certainly consider it, as I believe the university is now better equipped to support its students' success. Overall, I appreciate PECS University's progress and look forward to seeing it grow.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Modern, practical and worth It

My experience with the Business Development Master’s program has been really great overall. It offers high-quality education with practical knowledge. The courses are well-structured. The program has been renewed and designed to match current business trends, not just old-school textbook knowledge. We worked on a bunch of case studies, group projects, and presentations. We also experienced real business scenarios in every semester from subjects like Project Management, Tutorial: Startup Lab, Marketing Analysis and Planning, ESG, etc. Another important factor is affordability. Compared to many other master’s programs in Europe, this one gives really good value for money. You’re getting a strong education, experienced lecturers, and a modern curriculum, without the crazy tuition fees you’d expect elsewhere. The programme also feels fresh and up-to-date. Topics like innovation, strategy, and business development are approached in a way that reflects what’s actually happening in the business world today. The atmosphere is great. The community is diverse, and working with people from different backgrounds adds a lot to the experience. Plus you can meet different cultures and get new friends from all around the World. Also the study department is a huge help for every student. I used to be a Student Representative and working with the staff was easy, because they supported and informed us constantly. Overall, I’d say the Business Development Master’s at PTE KTK is a great choice if you’re looking for something modern, practical, and affordable, without sacrificing quality.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close