Central European University - CEU vs University of Szeged vs ESSCA School of Management vs Budapest Metropolitan University vs University of Pécs
Side-by-side comparison from 112 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse student body and international perspective
- +High academic rigor and intellectual stimulation
- +Expert faculty and dedicated mentorship
- +Excellent and supportive faculty and staff
- +Diverse and well-structured academic programs
- +Welcoming and advantageous environment for students
- +Practical, real-world learning and international environment
- +Supportive staff and quality teaching
- +Engaging content and diverse student body
- +Unique, broad, and exploratory learning approach
- +Modern, open-minded environment
- +Practical and theoretical course balance
- +Approachable, experienced faculty
- +Supportive, multicultural community
Nothing to show
- +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with real-world focus
- +Affordable, international study environment
- +Welcoming city with good social opportunities
- -Rigid academic structure and lack of intellectual engagement.
- -Insufficient financial aid and rising tuition fees.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Limited opportunities for practical experience and insufficient career support are major drawbacks.
- -Outdated and irrelevant course content and teaching.
- -Poor value for money due to high costs and ineffective curriculum.
- -Disengaged student body focused on social activities over academics.
- -Lack of practical skills and real-world application in the curriculum.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment create a poor learning environment.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and inefficient management cause frustration.
- -Lack of accessible and timely support exacerbates student difficulties.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
Internationality stands out as the strongest area, achieving an impressive rating. Conversely, facilities present the weakest aspect, with a score of 3.56. Other areas like professors and student life received strong marks, while location, accommodation, and value also scored positively, indicating a generally well-regarded institution with distinct strengths and some room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.
This institution demonstrates a strong performance across multiple aspects, with student life and professors receiving particularly high marks. While facilities and accommodation are rated well, they represent the areas with room for improvement compared to other categories. The university also scores favorably in location, internationality, and value.
With impressive scores in several key areas, this university excels in its Professors, Student Life, and Internationality, all receiving a strong 4.2. Location and Value also garnered positive marks at 4. However, the Facilities, rated at 3.7, and Accomodation, at 3.3, represent the areas with the most room for improvement.
This university presents a generally positive but mixed picture. Its strongest areas include Internationality, scoring a solid 4. Professors also received a commendable rating of 3.67. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation are its weakest points, both averaging a 3. Facilities, Location, and Value are all rated moderately at 3.33.
This institution garners excellent marks in key areas, with Internationality standing out at 4.53, closely followed by Location (4.44) and Student Life (4.44). Value for money is also highly rated at 4.26. While Facilities and Accommodations also score well (around 4.18), Professors received slightly lower, though still strong, feedback at 4.14.
Nothing to show
This university garners high marks in several key areas, with Internationality and Location being particularly strong at 4.64 and 4.57 respectively. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive excellent scores, all above 4.35. Accommodations are rated well at 4.21. Student Life, however, is the weakest area with a rating of 3.8.
~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, teaching methods, and faculty expertise. ~20% of feedback is negative, citing rigid academic structure and a lack of critical engagement.
University of Szeged receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~83% of reviews being highly positive (4-5 stars). Students appreciate the wide range of faculties, great library, and scholarship opportunities. Teaching methodologies and supportive professors are frequently praised.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 10 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students highlight practical, international, and supportive learning environments with quality teaching and facilities. One negative review (~10%) cited relevance and cost concerns.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is mixed. Approximately 33% of reviews are negative, citing a lack of technical skills and real-world experience. Positive comments highlight the university's unique, modern, and open-minded approach.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~91%), highlighting a strong academic foundation with a practical and theoretical balance. Professors are praised for fairness, real-world experience, and approachability, creating a dynamic learning environment. Limited on-campus job opportunities were a minor concern.
Nothing to show
~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, up-to-date curricula and hands-on learning. Negative feedback, representing ~0%, was not provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
Nothing to show
My honest opinion of PECS University has evolved significantly over the years. When I first started, I faced numerous challenges, including language barriers, a lack of lecturers who spoke English, and insufficient support for learning Hungarian, especially in my department. However, Pécs listened to our complaints and made strides to improve the situation. If someone had asked me whether I would recommend Pécs while I was still there, I would have said no. However, based on what I see now, I truly believe the improvements are worth giving it a chance. The university has enhanced its resources, offered more diverse course options, and fostered a more inclusive environment. It's also important to mention that Pécs is such a peaceful and serene city, which adds to the overall experience of studying there. If the opportunity arises for me to return for a master's degree, I would certainly consider it, as I believe the university is now better equipped to support its students' success. Overall, I appreciate PECS University's progress and look forward to seeing it grow.
Nothing to show
My experience with the Business Development Master’s program has been really great overall. It offers high-quality education with practical knowledge. The courses are well-structured. The program has been renewed and designed to match current business trends, not just old-school textbook knowledge. We worked on a bunch of case studies, group projects, and presentations. We also experienced real business scenarios in every semester from subjects like Project Management, Tutorial: Startup Lab, Marketing Analysis and Planning, ESG, etc. Another important factor is affordability. Compared to many other master’s programs in Europe, this one gives really good value for money. You’re getting a strong education, experienced lecturers, and a modern curriculum, without the crazy tuition fees you’d expect elsewhere. The programme also feels fresh and up-to-date. Topics like innovation, strategy, and business development are approached in a way that reflects what’s actually happening in the business world today. The atmosphere is great. The community is diverse, and working with people from different backgrounds adds a lot to the experience. Plus you can meet different cultures and get new friends from all around the World. Also the study department is a huge help for every student. I used to be a Student Representative and working with the staff was easy, because they supported and informed us constantly. Overall, I’d say the Business Development Master’s at PTE KTK is a great choice if you’re looking for something modern, practical, and affordable, without sacrificing quality.
