EU Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Universitat Pompeu Fabra - UPF vs UIC Barcelona
Side-by-side comparison from 436 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert professors and practical, real-world business applications
- +Strong emphasis on hands-on experience and out-of-class learning
- +Vibrant international student community and engaging campus life
- +Knowledgeable and engaged professors
- +Diverse and friendly international community
- +Well-structured learning and engaging student activities
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +Inspiring professors with professional experience
- +Excellent academic programs and practical teaching style
- +Ideal Barcelona location and international atmosphere
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
- +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
- +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
- +Passionate and knowledgeable faculty providing strong support for career readiness.
- +Diverse and welcoming multicultural environment fostering collaboration and soft skills.
- +Accessible instructors and helpful staff dedicated to student success and growth.
- +Integrated marketing, psychology, and neuroscience curriculum
- +Expert instructors and supportive staff
- +Practical application and industry connections
- -Disorganization, poor staff support, and lack of clear academic guidance are significant issues.
- -Educational quality is perceived as basic, with issues in course content, teaching, and study facilities.
- -Administrative problems, lack of accreditation, and a focus on profit over education are recurring complaints.
- -Poor academic quality and unhelpful degrees.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Inadequate facilities and misleading internship promises.
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Administrative & management issues create inefficiency and a feeling of being undervalued.
- -Inconsistent student background levels dilute specialized discussions and course demands.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Lack of support for internships and career services is a recurring complaint.
- -Inconsistent staff helpfulness and unaddressed student grievances are disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
- -Communication is often poor, leading to confusion and unmet expectations.
This university demonstrates significant strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring notably high. Student life and facilities also received positive marks. However, accommodation emerged as the weakest area, reflecting a potential point of concern. Professors and the overall value proposition are rated moderately well, indicating a generally solid but improvable performance in these aspects.
The university's strengths lie notably in its **internationality (4.52)** and **professors (4.2)**, with **location (4.22)** also receiving high marks. Conversely, **accommodation (2.95)** is its weakest area. Other aspects like **facilities (3.5)**, **student life (3.58)**, and **value (3.84)** fall within a moderate range.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
Across various metrics, the university garners solid to excellent feedback. Location stands out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.55. Areas like Facilities (4.10) and Student Life (4.02) also received favorable scores. Conversely, Accomodation (3.64) and Internationality (3.63) represent the weakest points, though still within a respectable range.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.
This institution garners significant praise, particularly for its professors, internationality, and location, all receiving scores above 4.4. Student life and value also score highly. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a considerably lower rating. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering, though improvements could be made in its housing provisions.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students in all surveyed areas, with no single category performing weaker than others.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising practical learning, industry expert professors, and engaging classes. A small percentage of feedback (~8%) is negative, citing disorganization and basic education.
~74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors and engaging learning. A small percentage (~11.1%) mention low educational levels and poor organization.
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
~83% of 124 reviews are positive, praising professors, organization, and international atmosphere. Negative feedback, representing ~1.6%, cites administrative inefficiency and program quality concerns.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.
With a 4.54 average rating, ~95% of reviews are positive, praising enthusiastic faculty, a diverse and supportive environment, and strong career preparation. A small minority (~5%) express dissatisfaction with staff consistency and internship support.
All 6 reviews were positive, giving an average of 5/5 stars. Students highlighted the program's blend of marketing, psychology, and neuroscience, and found classes engaging and practical. Professors were professional and supportive.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
My program here has many outstanding aspects, but one that stands out is the quality of the faculty. They are not only experienced professionals but also active researchers. Their expertise and insights make the program even stronger, especially because they are thorough and ensure each student grasps the material.
Nothing to show
My journey at Pompeu Fabra has been nothing short of inspiring. The university's emphasis on research and real-world application ignited a fire within me to explore my field in depth. My professors were more than just educators; they were passionate mentors who challenged me to think critically and independently. The vibrant energy of Barcelona, combined with the university's international focus, created an environment where I felt both stimulated and supported. UPF has equipped me with a robust skill set and a global perspective, preparing me to make a meaningful impact on the world.
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
