New York College European and American Education - NYC vs Epoka University - EPOKA vs Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana - FEUT vs Albanian University - UFO vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT

Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University Marin Barleti - UMB (4.50)
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/6 categories
Epoka University - EPOKA: wins 0/6 categories
Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana - FEUT: wins 0/6 categories
Albanian University - UFO: wins 1/6 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 2/6 categories
University Marin Barleti - UMB: wins 3/6 categories
Catholic University Our Lady of Good Counsel: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Dentistry
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.00
2.28
3.67
3.67
5.00
Win
3.50
Location
Not rated
2.00
3.76
4.67
Win
4.33
4.00
3.50
Professors
Not rated
3.00
3.36
4.50
4.67
5.00
Win
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
3.00
2.32
3.33
4.67
Win
4.50
4.50
Student life
Not rated
2.00
2.36
3.83
4.00
4.00
2.25
Value
Not rated
3.00
3.08
4.00
4.67
Win
4.50
4.25
Accommodation
Not rated
3.00
2.20
3.17
4.00
4.50
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent academic programs and preparation for future careers.
  • +Qualified and approachable faculty.
  • +Good campus facilities and international opportunities.
  • +Excellent academic staff & innovative teaching methods
  • +Great infrastructure, modern facilities, and diverse resources
  • +Valuable opportunities for practical application and international exchange
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Qualified and experienced pedagogical staff
  • +Positive and welcoming university environment
  • +Employment and training opportunities
  • +High-quality education and dedicated, well-prepared professors
  • +Strong preparation for the job market
  • +Valuable resources and inspiring learning environment
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure.
  • -Lack of practical application and career support.
  • -Administrative and communication issues.
  • -Concerns about grade inflation and lack of academic rigor.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

Nothing to show

When examining the university's performance across various categories, location stands out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest point, with the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. Other notable areas include professors and value, which received moderate ratings, while facilities, student life, and internationality scored lower.

Overall, this institution receives a solid rating of 4 for value. Its strongest areas are Location and Professors, both achieving scores above 4.5. Student Life and Internationality are rated moderately well, with scores around 3.3 to 3.8. The weakest aspects appear to be Facilities and Accomodation, with ratings below 3.7.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its **facilities and professors**, both scoring a perfect five. The university also excels in **student life, internationality, and overall value**, each earning a strong 4.5. Its weakest area, while still positive, is its **location**, rated at 4. Accommodation also scores well at 4.5.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its internationality, scoring an impressive 4.5, and offers excellent value with a rating of 4.25. Professors are also highly regarded at 4. Facilities and location are rated moderately at 3.5. Student life emerges as the weakest area, receiving a 2.25, while accommodation sits at a respectable 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

Nothing to show

Roughly 32% of reviews are negative. Positive feedback highlights prepared professors and good programs, while negative comments cite poor facilities, outdated materials, and lack of practical application.

With an average rating of 3.83/5, ~83% of reviews are positive, praising excellent academic staff, great infrastructure, and valuable opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~17%) expressed concerns about academic integrity.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the specialized and experienced pedagogical staff, the comfortable environment, and opportunities for employment and training. Negative feedback is minimal.

With an average rating of 4.25/5, nearly all feedback is positive. Students praise the high quality of education, dedicated professors, and resources that prepare them for the job market.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
4%
33%
0%
50%
50%
4★
100%
0%
32%
50%
100%
50%
25%
3★
0%
100%
32%
0%
0%
0%
25%
2★
0%
0%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
16%
17%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Concerning FEUT

It has a lot of place for improvement in every aspect. It needs to work on it's facilities and schedules. It desperately needs to fix the heat system and all the classrooms. It lacks a lot when it comes to putting in practise what you been studying and should help it's students when it comes to finding an internship.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close