EU Business School vs SKEMA Business School vs MIB Trieste School of Management vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs INSEEC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 471 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert professors and practical, real-world business applications
- +Strong emphasis on hands-on experience and out-of-class learning
- +Vibrant international student community and engaging campus life
- +strong international exposure & opportunities
- +practical and relevant program curriculum & skills
- +valuable alumni network & career support
- +Strong international and multicultural environment
- +High professionalism of staff and professors with real-world insights
- +Practical and well-structured programs focused on skills development
- +Practical, real-world preparation
- +Personal and professional growth
- +International experience
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Modern, well-equipped campus and facilities
- +Diverse student community and vibrant campus life
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
- -Disorganization, poor staff support, and lack of clear academic guidance are significant issues.
- -Educational quality is perceived as basic, with issues in course content, teaching, and study facilities.
- -Administrative problems, lack of accreditation, and a focus on profit over education are recurring complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare, with concerns about teaching quality and discrimination.
- -Ineffective career guidance and support for students.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff create frustration.
- -Overcrowded classes and excessive workload lead to stress.
- -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of student engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues, including favoritism.
- -Lack of appreciation and exploitation of student labor.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
This university demonstrates significant strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring notably high. Student life and facilities also received positive marks. However, accommodation emerged as the weakest area, reflecting a potential point of concern. Professors and the overall value proposition are rated moderately well, indicating a generally solid but improvable performance in these aspects.
A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors and internationality stand out as particularly strong aspects, receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also rated positively. However, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Value for money is also a solid, though not exceptional, performer in this rating overview.
This university garners a strong overall rating, with particular praise for its Location, scoring 4.71, and Student Life, achieving 4.73. Professors and Value also received high marks at 4.68. Accommodations emerged as the area with the lowest, though still respectable, rating at 4.45.
This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
This university achieves its highest marks in **Value** (4.42) and **Facilities** (4.32). **Internationality** (4.23) and **Accomodation** (4.14) also score well. **Professors** (4.16) are rated favorably. The **Location** (3.89) emerges as the weakest area among the surveyed categories, with **Student Life** (3.9) also being a comparatively lower score.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising practical learning, industry expert professors, and engaging classes. A small percentage of feedback (~8%) is negative, citing disorganization and basic education.
Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and helpful alumni networks. A small percentage (around 3%) cite issues with management, communication, and organization.
MIB Trieste School of Management receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% positive reviews). Students highlight its strong international environment, multiculturalism, and highly qualified professors. Practical learning, global perspectives, and networking opportunities are frequently praised.
All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
Approximately 97% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, modern facilities, and a supportive, diverse community. One negative review mentioned issues with staff and learning experience.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
The program at MIB Trieste School of Management allowed me to acquire solid management skills in an international context. The courses are well-structured, focused on practice and group projects. I particularly appreciated the cultural diversity and the interaction with students from all over the world. I recommend this school to those looking for an enriching and professional learning experience. The organization could be improved at times, but overall, the experience was very positive.
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Nothing to show
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
