GBSB Global Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Escola d'Art i Disseny de Tarragona - EADT vs Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera - CEU UCH vs Rovira i Virgili University - URV

Side-by-side comparison from 111 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
GBSB Global Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO: wins 1/5 categories
Escola d'Art i Disseny de Tarragona - EADT: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera - CEU UCH: wins 1/5 categories
Rovira i Virgili University - URV: wins 0/5 categories
Cesda Flight School: wins 0/5 categories
TETR College of Business: wins 3/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration and Digital Innovation
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Accounting
Tarragona, Spain
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
New York City, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Management & Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
3.38
4.17
1.00
4.56
Win
3.68
Not rated
4.50
Location
4.36
4.00
2.00
3.80
3.40
Not rated
4.50
Win
Professors
4.19
4.00
4.00
4.53
4.02
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.61
3.83
5.00
4.65
3.75
Not rated
5.00
Student life
3.64
4.17
3.00
4.35
3.72
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
3.74
4.17
5.00
4.48
3.80
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
2.78
4.60
Win
3.00
3.85
3.45
Not rated
4.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable professors
  • +Diverse and high-quality student community
  • +Well-structured learning and accessible resources
  • +Supportive faculty and staff
  • +Modern facilities and resources
  • +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
  • +Enhanced career prospects and professional development abroad
  • +Expanded global perspective and architectural vision
  • +Strong practical focus with real-world brand experience
  • +Supportive teachers and excellent campus facilities/resources
  • +Diverse, multicultural student body and environment
  • +High-quality, research-oriented academics and teaching
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty and staff
  • +Excellent location with good facilities and international opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
  • +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
  • +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
Cons
  • -Poor academic quality and irrelevant degrees.
  • -Inadequate facilities and lack of administrative support.
  • -Poor organization and unfulfilled internship promises.
  • -Poor management and unqualified staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are perceived as outdated and insufficient.
  • -The curriculum lacks practicality and relevance.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistent complaints.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application for many students.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated and unengaging teaching staff negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Course content and structure are often poorly designed and disorganized.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates outstanding strengths in its **Internationality**, receiving a near-perfect score, and its **Location** is also highly praised. The quality of its **Professors** is another area of significant achievement. Conversely, **Accomodation** appears to be the weakest aspect, with a considerably lower rating. Other areas like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range.

This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in **internationality** and **value**, both receiving perfect scores. Its academic core also shines, with **professors** earning a high rating of 4. However, the university's **facilities** present a significant area for improvement, scoring a low 1. Student life and accommodation are rated moderately well, while the location is also a point of moderate concern.

This university garners exceptionally high marks in internationality, boasting a rating of 4.65. Facilities also received strong acclaim at 4.56, closely followed by professors at 4.53 and value at 4.48. The student experience is well-regarded, with a 4.35 rating for student life. Location and accommodation represent the areas with the lowest scores, both falling in the upper 3-point range.

This institution garners its highest marks for its **Professors** (4.02) and **Value** (3.80). Areas showing moderate performance include **Student Life** (3.72), **Internationality** (3.75), and **Facilities** (3.68). Its lowest-rated aspects are **Location** (3.40) and **Accomodation** (3.45), suggesting these are the primary areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and engaging lecturers, a diverse community, and well-structured assignments. A small portion of feedback (~9.1%) mentions a lack of organization and insufficient internship support.

Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from 1 review, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. The sole reviewer highlights its significant career benefits and ability to broaden professional vision. Negative feedback is negligible.

With ~94% positive sentiment, reviews highlight enriching theoretical and practical skills, multicultural environments, and helpful teachers. Some noted the campus is a bit far from the city. No negative feedback was reported.

Around 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting rigorous programs, cooperative teachers, and convenient facilities. A small percentage of feedback notes administrative inefficiency and outdated teaching.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.

Rating distribution
5★
21%
71%
100%
29%
18%
0%
100%
4★
52%
0%
0%
65%
62%
0%
0%
3★
18%
14%
0%
6%
14%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
1★
9%
14%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Its ok

The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Studying at CEU prepared me for the world.

Studying Advertising and public relations at CEU Cardenal Herrera was an enriching and transformative experience. One thing I standout is the combined theoretical and practical skills we learned throughout the career. We work hand on hand with well known brands that give us a profesional view and a bigger understanding of the profesional world. The multicultural environment at CEU help me develop cultural sensibility and open my perspective because of the diverse backgrounds. The most enriching experience was living in the amazing city en Valencia, its stunning architecture and its amazing food. I graduated feeling confident and prepared to enter to the professional world.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Loving it here!

Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close