Universidad Europea - UE vs Escola d'Art i Disseny de Tarragona - EADT vs University of Deusto - Deusto Business School vs Rovira i Virgili University - URV vs Cesda Flight School
Side-by-side comparison from 159 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Modern teaching and attractive campus
- +Strong business opportunities and practical learning
- +Supportive faculty and international exchange programs
- +Enhanced career prospects and professional development abroad
- +Expanded global perspective and architectural vision
- +Welcoming community and supportive, knowledgeable professors
- +Comprehensive and practical academic programs
- +Enriching personal and global development
- +High-quality, research-oriented academics and teaching
- +Supportive and approachable faculty and staff
- +Excellent location with good facilities and international opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- +Practical, real-world project application
- +Strong industry connections and networking opportunities
- +Supportive and collaborative academic environment
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
- -Teachers are indifferent and unsupportive of student learning.
- -High costs for course materials.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are perceived as outdated and insufficient.
- -The curriculum lacks practicality and relevance.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and student comfort.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a significant problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated and unengaging teaching staff negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Course content and structure are often poorly designed and disorganized.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and resources hinders academic progress.
Overall, the university receives strong marks, particularly in **Internationality (4.6)** and **Facilities (4.33)**. Student Life and Professors also score well, both above 4.2. The weakest areas identified are **Accomodation (3.87)** and **Value (3.78)**, though these still represent a moderately positive rating.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in **internationality** and **value**, both receiving perfect scores. Its academic core also shines, with **professors** earning a high rating of 4. However, the university's **facilities** present a significant area for improvement, scoring a low 1. Student life and accommodation are rated moderately well, while the location is also a point of moderate concern.
This institution shows strong performance in several key areas, with Location and Value both receiving a high rating of 4.37. Professors and Facilities are also well-regarded, scoring 4.26. Student Life, at 4.11, and Internationality, at 3.84, are moderately rated. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, which received a score of 3.26.
This institution garners its highest marks for its **Professors** (4.02) and **Value** (3.80). Areas showing moderate performance include **Student Life** (3.72), **Internationality** (3.75), and **Facilities** (3.68). Its lowest-rated aspects are **Location** (3.40) and **Accomodation** (3.45), suggesting these are the primary areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
This institution garners near-perfect scores across several key areas, excelling in Facilities, Professors, and Student Life with a full five stars. Internationality and Value are also highly rated, reflecting a strong offering. Location and Accommodation are the comparatively weakest points, though still receiving excellent marks.
Nearly 74% of 54 reviews are positive, highlighting modern teaching methods, spacious campuses, and good career opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~3.7%) notes administrative issues and unengaged instructors.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from 1 review, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. The sole reviewer highlights its significant career benefits and ability to broaden professional vision. Negative feedback is negligible.
With ~90% positive feedback, students highlight welcoming communities and exceptionally useful, kindly delivered teaching. The average rating is 4.27/5.
Around 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting rigorous programs, cooperative teachers, and convenient facilities. A small percentage of feedback notes administrative inefficiency and outdated teaching.
Nothing to show
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
All 8 reviews are positive, with a 5/5 average rating. Students highlight practical learning through real projects with companies, strong networking opportunities with industry professionals, and a supportive, international environment.
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
Nothing to show
The DBS MBA is a master's degree for people who really want to learn a lot in a relatively short time, to do so they use a very dynamic and fast-paced work methodology, and in my opinion very useful and effective. In addition, teamwork is encouraged almost at all times, values that are highly valued if you come from more autonomous training such as engineering. The more purely theoretical training is also combined with real cases of entrepreneurship or experiences of successful people with high experience in the business world. Without a doubt, quality-price, I think it is the best master's degree you can opt for. Of course, being part of the Deusto Business School will greatly facilitate your access to the world of work, as well as a great networking network.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
My experience at Advantere was very positive. The Master’s in Talent Management combines a holistic approach to people management with a strong focus on practical learning. One of the highlights was the Project-Based Learning (PBL) methodology, where we worked on real challenges presented by leading companies such as KPMG, allowing us to apply what we learned in real business contexts. I especially appreciated the collaborative and international environment, as well as the balance between academic knowledge and professional development. I would recommend this program to anyone looking for a hands-on and innovative experience in talent management.
