University of Toronto - UofT vs University of Sunderland vs University of British Columbia vs McMaster University vs Brock University
Side-by-side comparison from 732 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +World-class professors and strong academic focus
- +Prestigious reputation and excellent networking opportunities
- +Welcoming campus environment and vibrant community life
- +Practical, UK-standard curriculum with critical thinking focus
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and accessible faculty
- +Welcoming and supportive environment for international students
- +Excellent professors and engaging courses
- +Abundant resources and study spaces
- +Strong career preparation and practical experience
- +Supportive and passionate professors
- +Welcoming and diverse student community
- +Engaging and versatile academic programs
- +Supportive community and approachable professors
- +Numerous experiential learning and career opportunities
- +Personalized attention and diverse, welcoming environment
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Administrative and management issues cause long wait times and understaffed services.
- -Teaching quality is inconsistent, with a focus on research over student learning experiences.
- -Limited career opportunities and a lack of sufficient academic and personal support resources exist.
- -Insufficient lecturers and inadequate course delivery
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Unclear communication and lack of student involvement
- -Administrative and course selection difficulties.
- -Subpar teaching quality and arbitrary grading.
- -Lack of genuine social connections outside of clubs.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -The curriculum or teaching quality is frequently criticized.
- -Unhelpful and overly stressful curriculum.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and lack of practical skill development.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality, boasting a high rating of 4.415. Its location also received a notable score of 4.374. The university offers good value and solid facilities and professor quality. Conversely, student life and accommodation present the weakest areas, with ratings of 3.795 and 3.836 respectively.
This university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **facilities**, scoring a high 4.52. **Professors** also receive positive recognition with a rating of 4.44. Areas that could benefit from further development include **accommodation**, which received the lowest rating at 3.75. Overall, the university presents a generally favorable image with solid scores in location, student life, internationality, and value.
This institution receives strong commendations for its **location (4.46)**, **internationality (4.35)**, and **student life (4.31)**. Facilities and value are also well-regarded, with ratings around 4.08 to 4.22. The **accommodation rating (3.86)** is the lowest among the surveyed aspects, indicating this is an area that could see improvement.
This university receives its highest marks in **Internationality**, boasting a rating of 4.49. Close behind is **Value** at 4.38, followed by **Facilities** and **Professors**, both scoring 4.22. The **Location** also performs well with a 4.13 rating. The **weakest area** of the university, though still strong, is **Accomodation** at 4.10. Overall, the institution presents a very positive picture.
This institution garners consistently positive feedback, with its **Value** standing out as the highest-rated category. Professors and facilities also received strong scores. Conversely, the **Accomodation** and **Internationality** aspects show room for improvement, receiving the lowest ratings among the surveyed areas. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with specific strengths to build upon.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
Approximately 84% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, research focus, and networking opportunities. Just ~1.6% of feedback is negative, with brief mentions of a fast pace and less emphasis on student services.
With a ~84% positive sentiment, students highlight valuable experiences, practical skills, and supportive lecturers. A small fraction (~1.6%) of reviews noted insufficient lecturers or a course not meeting expectations.
With 190 reviews and an average rating of 4.23/5, ~87% of students report positive experiences, citing excellent academics, professors, and campus resources. A small amount of feedback (approx. 1%) noted difficulties with course selection and finding genuine connections.
Approximately 90% of university reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive community, knowledgeable and passionate professors, and a positive academic experience. No negative feedback was reported.
With a 4.26 rating from 65 reviews, ~83% of students express positive experiences, highlighting community, professor care, and experiential learning opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~1.5%) mentions program stress and relevance concerns.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
The program itself is great and really prepares you for an academic career, but the quality of the supervisors varies a lot. Some people in the department are excellent and enjoy empowering their students, but the majority of profs make you feel like they're doing you a favour by giving you their time of day/guidance. Might be an issue exclusively with this department, but still. And the campus is cool! Great cheap eats around. Shout out to El Rey for when you want to splurge a bit and get some awesome tacos!
Nothing to show
I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.
Joining Mcmaster University is a wonderful experience. I personally have learned a lot. In addition, I really recommend and encourage students to join this school. University has a variety of courses.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
