Torrens University Australia vs University of South Australia vs University of New England vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Learning People
Side-by-side comparison from 64 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and interactive classes with knowledgeable and passionate professors
- +Flexible learning options catering to working students
- +Practical, real-world experience emphasized
- +Wide course selection and ample opportunities
- +Friendly student body and approachable staff
- +Excellent facilities and diverse clubs
- +Flexible and accessible online learning options
- +High-quality academic programs and experienced faculty
- +Supportive student services and community focus
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues like course changes and unclear enrollment practices.
- -High costs and questionable value for money regarding tuition fees.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching staff and potentially rude or untrained facilitators.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from administration and faculty.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and technology.
- -Limited career services and internship opportunities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates strengths in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, **Student Life** stands out as the area requiring the most attention, with the lowest score. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated similarly and fall in the mid-range. Accomodation and Internationality also received respectable, though slightly lower, scores compared to the strongest category.
This university demonstrates a robust performance across several key areas. Student life stands out as the highest-rated category, closely followed by internationality. Facilities and value also receive commendations. The weakest area identified is accommodation, though it still garners a respectable score, indicating a generally positive experience for students surveyed.
This institution garners strong marks in several key areas, with Facilities being the standout at 4.45. Professors and Student Life also receive favorable scores, alongside a solid rating for Value. Conversely, Internationality presents the lowest rating at 3.86, indicating a potential area for growth. Accommodations and Location also fall slightly below the highest-rated aspects.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
~63% of reviews are positive, praising flexible learning, passionate professors, and engaging classes. ~37.5% of feedback is negative, citing course changes and high costs.
With 24 out of 27 reviews being positive (approximately 89%), students highlight numerous opportunities, diverse courses, and good facilities. Friendly students and approachable, helpful staff are frequently praised. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a 4.24/5 average rating from 21 reviews, ~95% are positive. Students praise academic excellence, flexible remote/in-person options, and supportive faculty. No negative feedback was recorded.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I want to share my experience with Torrens University. They initially gave me an offer letter and Confirmation of Enrollment (COE), but after I had been in the course for a year, they changed the name of the course and added more subjects to my study plan. It really feels like Torrens is using this format to make more money from students. This kind of practice is frustrating and makes it hard for us to plan our studies effectively.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
