London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Lancaster University vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs University of Cumbria vs Lancaster University Management School - LUMS
Side-by-side comparison from 438 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Strong academic programs and supportive, in-depth teaching
- +Safe and welcoming campus environment with a sense of community
- +Practical and relevant course content with good facilities
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Practical, career-focused programs and employability emphasis
- +Supportive and motivating teaching staff
- +Enjoyable study environment and facilities
- +Strong business programmes and career preparation
- +Good campus facilities and community engagement
- +Opportunities for personal and professional development
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Innovative delivery model
- +Accessible, skilled lecturers
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Mismatched course content and unexpected technical requirements cause distress.
- -The overall academic experience is highly stressful and negatively impactful.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods lack relevance and engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **Internationality**, achieving a standout rating. Facilities also rank highly. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest score among the assessed aspects, indicating potential areas for improvement in this regard. Other categories like Professors, Accomodation, Student Life, and Value are all rated favorably, reflecting a generally positive student experience.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
With a standout score for professors, this institution clearly excels in academic instruction. Conversely, facilities present the lowest-rated aspect. Other areas like location and accommodation are well-regarded, suggesting a generally positive student experience, though student life scores are moderate. Internationality and value also receive favorable marks.
The university demonstrates exceptional strength in its facilities, receiving a top rating. Student life and accommodation also score highly, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Internationality is also well-regarded. Conversely, the location is the weakest aspect, with a significantly lower score compared to other categories. Value and professors receive solid, above-average marks.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie in its excellent professors, ideal location, and strong international presence, all earning high marks. Student life is identified as a weaker area, receiving a notably lower rating. Other aspects, including facilities, accommodation, and overall value, fall within a positive range.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
With an average rating of 4.28/5 from 89 reviews, ~99% of feedback is positive. Students praise in-depth teaching, strong course content, and a safe, community-focused campus. Isolated negative feedback exists.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
Most reviews are highly positive, rating the university 4.5/5. Students praise practical, career-focused programs, supportive staff, and appealing campuses. No negative feedback was recorded.
With ~67% of feedback being positive, students highlight fantastic life and academic experiences, exceptional business education facilities, and great opportunities for career preparation. A ~33% of feedback mentions decent instruction and friendly people, with enjoyable sporting events and a good sense of community.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
With an average rating of 4/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight UHI's unique partnership model with colleges. Students appreciate the skilled lecturers and innovative video-conferencing approach connecting diverse locations across Scotland.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
I joined Lancaster University at a time when it ranked in the Top 10 universities in the UK. The subject matter of my courses were academically enriching and the campus is a beautiful place to be in and amongst (other than December). Following the emergence of covid, classes were moved online. This naturally derailed learning and social experiences that are vital to a university experience. Overall, Lancaster as a university is of a very high standard, though if you're someone who is looking for an intense party culture in the main town, you may be disappointed. The main plus of Lancaster University is the campus itself; the city will become mundane after a while once everywhere has been explored in the first few months.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has been a fantastic life experience as well as a great academic one. I first decided to go to Lancaster University Management School due to its exceptional business education facilities and have not been disappointed. I recommend the university to anybody that wants to put themselves in a strong position for a career upon graduation.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
