Central European University - CEU vs Budapest Business University - BBU vs University of Debrecen vs University of Szeged vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 158 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse student body and international perspective
- +High academic rigor and intellectual stimulation
- +Expert faculty and dedicated mentorship
- +Practical knowledge and real-world application
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Strong student support and well-structured courses
- +Approachable and invested lecturers
- +Internationally diverse and friendly student community
- +Strong, well-structured programs with practical application
- +Excellent and supportive faculty and staff
- +Diverse and well-structured academic programs
- +Welcoming and advantageous environment for students
- +Practical, real-world learning and international environment
- +Supportive staff and quality teaching
- +Engaging content and diverse student body
- +Friendly, international learning environment
- +Supportive professors, practical business concepts
- +Organized classes, useful study materials
- +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with real-world focus
- +Affordable, international study environment
- +Welcoming city with good social opportunities
- -Rigid academic structure and lack of intellectual engagement.
- -Insufficient financial aid and rising tuition fees.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Unprofessional teaching staff and language barriers.
- -Disorganized structure and struggles with course registration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant stress.
- -Lack of teacher support and career/job assistance is a major problem.
- -The quality of studies is perceived as poor in many programs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Limited opportunities for practical experience and insufficient career support are major drawbacks.
- -Outdated and irrelevant course content and teaching.
- -Poor value for money due to high costs and ineffective curriculum.
- -Disengaged student body focused on social activities over academics.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
Internationality stands out as the strongest area, achieving an impressive rating. Conversely, facilities present the weakest aspect, with a score of 3.56. Other areas like professors and student life received strong marks, while location, accommodation, and value also scored positively, indicating a generally well-regarded institution with distinct strengths and some room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.
This university garners a strong overall rating, with Location emerging as its most celebrated aspect. Professors and Value are also highly regarded. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Student Life and Facilities are mid-range, while Internationality is also a notable strength. The university presents a generally positive picture, with distinct areas of excellence and areas for potential improvement.
This institution garners exceptional praise for its **Internationality**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Facilities** also stand out with a high rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. The university demonstrates solid performance in **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, with **Location** also being well-regarded.
This institution demonstrates a strong performance across multiple aspects, with student life and professors receiving particularly high marks. While facilities and accommodation are rated well, they represent the areas with room for improvement compared to other categories. The university also scores favorably in location, internationality, and value.
With impressive scores in several key areas, this university excels in its Professors, Student Life, and Internationality, all receiving a strong 4.2. Location and Value also garnered positive marks at 4. However, the Facilities, rated at 3.7, and Accomodation, at 3.3, represent the areas with the most room for improvement.
Overall, this institution demonstrates a solid performance across multiple facets of student experience. Its location receives the highest mark, a testament to its desirable setting. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, suggesting potential room for improvement in this regard. Other aspects like facilities, professors, student life, internationality, and value are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded educational environment.
This university garners high marks in several key areas, with Internationality and Location being particularly strong at 4.64 and 4.57 respectively. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive excellent scores, all above 4.35. Accommodations are rated well at 4.21. Student Life, however, is the weakest area with a rating of 3.8.
~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, teaching methods, and faculty expertise. ~20% of feedback is negative, citing rigid academic structure and a lack of critical engagement.
~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical knowledge and professional, up-to-date teachers. ~9.5% of feedback indicates issues with communication and organization.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable lecturers and a beautiful campus. Negative feedback, about 4.3%, points to a lack of structured support and occasional issues with specific departments or programs.
University of Szeged receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~83% of reviews being highly positive (4-5 stars). Students appreciate the wide range of faculties, great library, and scholarship opportunities. Teaching methodologies and supportive professors are frequently praised.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 10 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students highlight practical, international, and supportive learning environments with quality teaching and facilities. One negative review (~10%) cited relevance and cost concerns.
With one review available, the university has a 4/5 average rating. The feedback highlights a friendly, international environment and supportive professors. No negative feedback was received.
~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, up-to-date curricula and hands-on learning. Negative feedback, representing ~0%, was not provided.
Nothing to show
The environment is good and it’s multicultural The compound is really nice but a bit far(depending on the faculty) They should have a sports team because of the facilities that they have They should really consider the sports career of the university
The university offers a strong academic foundation with well-structured courses and a wide range of modules to choose from. I appreciated the flexibility of the programme, which allowed me to explore my interests while still gaining core knowledge in my field. Lecturers were approachable and genuinely invested in students’ growth, and the academic support available was excellent. However, I found that some courses were a bit too theoretical and would have benefited from more hands-on or industry-relevant components. Despite that, the overall environment encouraged self-discipline, curiosity, and collaboration. I would recommend this university to students who are self-motivated and eager to take ownership of their learning journey.
Nothing to show
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
Nothing to show
My experience with the Business Development Master’s program has been really great overall. It offers high-quality education with practical knowledge. The courses are well-structured. The program has been renewed and designed to match current business trends, not just old-school textbook knowledge. We worked on a bunch of case studies, group projects, and presentations. We also experienced real business scenarios in every semester from subjects like Project Management, Tutorial: Startup Lab, Marketing Analysis and Planning, ESG, etc. Another important factor is affordability. Compared to many other master’s programs in Europe, this one gives really good value for money. You’re getting a strong education, experienced lecturers, and a modern curriculum, without the crazy tuition fees you’d expect elsewhere. The programme also feels fresh and up-to-date. Topics like innovation, strategy, and business development are approached in a way that reflects what’s actually happening in the business world today. The atmosphere is great. The community is diverse, and working with people from different backgrounds adds a lot to the experience. Plus you can meet different cultures and get new friends from all around the World. Also the study department is a huge help for every student. I used to be a Student Representative and working with the staff was easy, because they supported and informed us constantly. Overall, I’d say the Business Development Master’s at PTE KTK is a great choice if you’re looking for something modern, practical, and affordable, without sacrificing quality.
