Universidad Iberoamericana - IBERO vs Universidad La Salle - ULSA vs Universidad Tecnológica de México - UNITEC vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Tecnológico Nacional de México

Side-by-side comparison from 80 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tecnológico Nacional de México (5.00)
Universidad Iberoamericana - IBERO: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad La Salle - ULSA: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Tecnológica de México - UNITEC: wins 1/5 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 2/5 categories
Tecnológico Nacional de México: wins 1/5 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Ironhack: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Art and Design
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
4.67
4.33
4.50
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.44
4.33
4.86
4.50
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.50
4.00
4.56
Win
4.41
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
3.69
4.00
3.78
4.59
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.56
4.33
4.75
4.63
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Value
4.25
4.00
4.00
4.63
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
4.13
3.67
4.00
4.66
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert professors and high academic rigor
  • +Strong practical and hands-on learning experiences
  • +Positive student environment and well-planned programs
  • +High academic quality and recognition
  • +Friendly environment and humanistic values
  • +Helpful professors and staff
  • +Quality teaching and accessible mentors
  • +Flexible study options for working students
  • +Supportive environment and engaging classes
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities
  • +Relevant and comprehensive curriculum with modern technology
  • +Dedicated and supportive faculty
  • +Rich academic and cultural activities

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
Cons
  • -Outdated study programs and inadequate coordinator training.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of support are recurring problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues create constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world application.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
  • -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a major concern.
  • -The curriculum is seen as irrelevant and not preparing students for the future.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its vibrant **Student Life** and highly regarded **Professors**, both scoring an impressive 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as a weaker area, with a considerably lower rating. Other aspects like Facilities, Value, and Accomodation fall within a solid mid-range.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks for its **Facilities**, achieving a score of 4.67. Its **Location** and **Student Life** are also well-regarded, both receiving 4.33. While **Professors** and **Internationality** are rated a solid 4, and **Value** at 4, the **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area with a score of 3.67.

This institution received outstanding scores for Location, scoring an impressive 4.86, and Student Life, with a strong 4.75. Professors also garnered high marks at 4.56. Areas for potential improvement include Internationality, which received the lowest rating at 3.78. Facilities, Accommodation, and Value were all rated a solid 4.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly excelling in its **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a perfect 5. Facilities, Professors, Accommodations, and Value are also highly rated, each earning a solid 4. While no areas fall below a strong standing, these latter categories represent the relative weakest points in its otherwise outstanding profile.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The vast majority of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent academic programs, expert professors, and practical learning experiences. A small portion of feedback suggests improvements to program currency and coordinator training.

With an average rating of 4.27/5 from 15 reviews, ~87% of feedback is positive. Students highlight high academic quality, excellent learning environments, and helpful staff. Location is a minor point for improvement.

Six positive reviews highlight good programs, accessible teachers, and flexible study options. These students appreciated mentor quality and support for those balancing work and study. No negative feedback was provided.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

These reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 100% of feedback rating the university 4-5 stars. Students highlight excellent technology, a relevant curriculum, dedicated teachers, and strong engineering programs as key strengths.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Rating distribution
5★
56%
40%
40%
67%
100%
0%
50%
4★
28%
47%
20%
39%
0%
0%
0%
3★
11%
13%
40%
3%
0%
0%
0%
2★
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close