Universidad de La Salle - LASALLE vs University of Tuzla - UNTZ vs European University Kallos Tuzla - EU Kallos Tuzla vs International Business Information Academy - IPIA vs Arizona Western College - AWC

Side-by-side comparison from 108 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: International Business Information Academy - IPIA (5.00)
Universidad de La Salle - LASALLE: wins 1/6 categories
University of Tuzla - UNTZ: wins 0/6 categories
European University Kallos Tuzla - EU Kallos Tuzla: wins 0/6 categories
International Business Information Academy - IPIA: wins 5/6 categories
Arizona Western College - AWC: wins 0/6 categories
Elizabethtown College: wins 0/6 categories
Catholic University of Pernambuco - UNICAP: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
3.50
Read more reviews
101 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Information Technology
Yuma, Arizona, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.33
Win
3.13
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.33
4.01
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.67
4.02
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
3.15
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.33
3.60
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
5.00
3.68
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.67
3.28
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and quality education/curriculum
  • +Strong focus on ethics and humanistic values
  • +Downtown campus offering urban experience
  • +High-quality, professional, and helpful professors
  • +Good educational programs fulfilling expectations
  • +Supportive environment and career prospects
  • +Friendly and accessible professors
  • +Good learning opportunities
  • +Modern facilities and location
  • +Quality education with supportive staff and professors
  • +Modern and well-equipped facilities and classrooms

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Poor teaching quality and insufficient academic support are disliked.
  • -Administrative and organizational issues are pervasive.
  • -Lack of practical application and outdated facilities are significant problems.
  • -Some professors exhibit poor teaching methods and rudeness.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff leave students feeling neglected.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant, lacking practical application and depth.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with an outstanding perfect score for **Value** and high marks for its **Professors**. The **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also received solid ratings. However, **Accomodation** is a moderately weaker area, and **Internationality** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects.

Regarding university performance, professors and location stand out as the strongest aspects, both receiving ratings around 4.0. Student life and value are also well-regarded, scoring above 3.5. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, accommodation, and internationality, which are rated in the low 3s. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid but varied performance across these key metrics.

This academic institution received consistently low ratings across all surveyed categories. Areas like facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all scored zero. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses to highlight, as the university appears to perform poorly across the board according to this assessment.

This institution demonstrates outstanding performance, achieving a perfect score in Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Its strongest areas are clearly these aspects, reflecting a highly positive student experience and excellent offerings. The Facilities rating, while still very good at 4, represents the only slight area for potential improvement within an otherwise exceptional overall assessment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5 stars. Students praise excellent teachers, quality education, and professional training that instills values and ethics.

Around 46% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality staff and curriculum, with some noting occasional subjective grading. About 17% are negative, citing poor organization and lack of practical application. The average rating is 3.49/5.

With an average rating of 4.33/5 based on 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the modern design, great location, and the kindness and professionalism of professors and staff. Some suggest improvements for certain faculties regarding curriculum and practical experience.

The sole review is highly positive, awarding 5 out of 5 stars. Students praise the quality education, supportive professors, and modern, well-equipped facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
23%
33%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
67%
23%
67%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
38%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

A waste of money

The price for the master's is insanely expensive considering what it has to offer. I got an MA in translation and interpreting, but sadly, my colleagues and I barely had any practical exercises in these subjects. Most of the professors were alright though. Bearing in mind where they work, most of them try to do their best. The university is politicized, since the politicians play with it like with ping-pong balls. The only aim is to employ their own people, no matter how incompetent they are, instead of the people who are actually able to do proper work. Anyone in their right mind (since I was not one of those people) will opt to study abroad and obtain the MA degree somewhere else. I paid 2500 KM so I can have a degree from an XY rated university, instead of studying in, say, Germany or Austria, where the prices are identical, or even lower, and where students can also get real scholarships if they're good enough. Once again, a waste of money. If only they (politicians) invested all that money in infrastructure and better equipment, the university would be a much nicer place and the main Uni building would not have 40 YO doors and windows.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close