Technical University of Berlin - TU Berlin vs SRH University of Applied Sciences vs Beuth University of Applied Sciences vs International University of Art for Fashion - ESMOD Berlin vs Hochschule Fresenius

Side-by-side comparison from 61 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Forward College (4.90)
Technical University of Berlin - TU Berlin: wins 0/5 categories
SRH University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/5 categories
Beuth University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/5 categories
International University of Art for Fashion - ESMOD Berlin: wins 1/5 categories
Hochschule Fresenius: wins 0/5 categories
Forward College: wins 1/5 categories
CODE University of Applied Sciences: wins 3/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Best programme: Business and Marketing
Best programme: Strategic Fashion Marketing
Idstein, Germany
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Economics
Paris, France
4.90
Top
Read more reviews
16 reviews
×
Best programme: Politics and International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
3.75
Not rated
4.00
3.67
4.47
5.00
Win
Location
3.94
4.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.06
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.22
4.08
Not rated
2.00
3.67
4.75
5.00
Win
Student life
4.06
3.91
Not rated
2.00
3.33
4.73
Win
3.00
Value
4.00
3.83
Not rated
2.00
4.00
4.63
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.71
3.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
4.33
1.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and supportive faculty
  • +Practical application and research focus
  • +Flexible learning and vibrant student life
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with modern equipment.
  • +Supportive professors and small, international classes fostering discussion.
  • +Strong academic programs and good company connections.

Nothing to show

  • +Comprehensive fashion industry training with expert teachers.
  • +Relevant and varied course content
  • +Helpful and educated faculty
  • +Supportive university staff
  • +Engaging learning environment with interactive methods
  • +Diverse and international student community
  • +Unique multi-city European study experience

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are prevalent.
  • -The financial office is perceived as rude and money-hungry.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology create frustrating learning environments.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
  • -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a concern.
  • -Lack of transparency and communication is prevalent.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

With an overall rating of 4, this institution demonstrates commendable strengths in **Internationality** (4.22) and **Student Life** (4.06), alongside solid scores for **Professors** and **Value**. Its **Accomodation** presents the area with the lowest score (3.71), suggesting potential for improvement in this aspect.

With a well-rounded performance, this university shines brightest in **Internationality** and **Professors**, both receiving scores above 4. Student life and value also present strong points. Conversely, **Accommodations** are the weakest area, scoring 3.25, while facilities also received a moderately lower rating.

Nothing to show

Assessing the university reveals a mixed picture. Outstanding ratings were achieved for Accomodation, scoring a perfect 5, and Facilities and Professors also received solid marks at 4. Conversely, Student Life and Internationality received lower scores of 2, indicating areas for potential improvement. Location and Value also scored a moderate 3 and a concerning 2 respectively.

With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.

This university garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in its **professors and location**, both achieving perfect scores. Student life and internationality also stand out with scores above 4.7. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **facilities and accommodation**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded positive student experience with high marks across most aspects.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4/5 average rating from 19 reviews, students praise strong academics, particularly in STEM fields, and appreciate research focus and practical application. Positive feedback highlights well-prepared professors and diverse learning opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.

~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning, international environment, and supportive professors. Negative feedback (~9.5%) mentions unorganized administration and issues with professor responsiveness.

Nothing to show

With one review and an average rating of 4/5, this university is positively perceived. The single review highlights its prestige and comprehensive fashion industry training with knowledgeable instructors.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.

Students highly praise the interactive learning, international community, and opportunities for academic and personal growth. There are no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
21%
19%
0%
0%
33%
94%
0%
4★
58%
38%
0%
100%
67%
6%
0%
3★
21%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Studies

Professors are supportive,and also guides students to better understanding of the concepts. But most of the time they are helping. There is also Case-Studies that helps us get better insights of real life cases.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Well structured course

Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.

Great modern university approach

I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.

Fastest Growing Startup University In Germany

I have mixed feelings about my experience at Code University. On one hand, it's a privilege to study at one of Berlin’s most prestigious institutions tuition-free. The professors are knowledgeable, and the curriculum is practical and forward-thinking — it has definitely contributed to my growth as a student and aspiring entrepreneur. However, my journey here hasn’t been smooth. During my Orientation Semester, I struggled with shyness and social anxiety. I found it difficult to engage in class and to make friends. Unfortunately, instead of receiving support, I was mocked — not just by students (which I could handle), but also by some lecturers. That was deeply discouraging. With time, I worked on myself and broke out of my shell. I’m now more confident and driven, and I’m currently building what I believe will be one of the most impactful student-led projects to come out of CODE. Ironically, that seems to have caused some friction. I feel like certain individuals who underestimated me in the past are now uncomfortable with my progress and success. Rather than support me, it feels like they're trying to hold me back. To add to that, despite referring three international students to CODE — something I do as a side hustle — I haven’t received any acknowledgment or recognition. While many of my peers are featured on the university’s website, I’ve noticed that I’m not represented at all. So, would I recommend Code University? It depends. If you're resilient and can handle both the highs and lows without losing focus, then yes — the academic value is real. But emotionally and socially, it can be a tough environment, especially if you don’t fit into the dominant culture right away. That said, my story at CODE is still being written. Let’s see how it all turns out.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close