The John Naisbitt University vs Singidunum University - UPIS vs University of Arts in Belgrade vs University of Defence - UO vs Dr Lazar Vrkatic Faculty of Law and Business Studies

Across all surveyed categories, the university received a uniform rating of zero. This indicates that all aspects, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, are performing at the lowest possible level. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses, as all areas present an equal and concerning lack of positive performance.

Offering a generally positive assessment, the university excels particularly in its **professors** and **location**, both scoring a high 4.43. Areas such as **facilities**, **student life**, **accommodation**, and **value** also received strong ratings, clustering around 4.14. The lowest score, though still respectable at 4.0, is for **internationality**.

This institution achieves near-perfect scores across several key areas. Facilities, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. Professors also receive a commendable rating of 4.67. The strongest areas are clearly those facilities, student experience, and practical aspects of attending, with the academic staff representing the sole area below a perfect score.

This university presents a uniform picture across all surveyed categories, with no specific areas standing out as particularly strong or weak. Ratings are consistently zero for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates an absence of positive or negative feedback in these key university aspects.

Across all evaluated aspects, this institution achieved perfect scores. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value were all rated a maximum of five. This indicates an outstanding and consistently high-quality experience in every surveyed area, with no particular strengths or weaknesses to highlight as all categories performed equally at the highest level.

One positive review highlights practical experience and internships, while one negative review points to declining lecture quality and perceived poor graduate employability. Sentiment is split, with approximately 50% of feedback being negative.

Approximately 89% of reviews are highly positive (4–5 stars), highlighting strong theoretical/practical knowledge and engaging academic environments. No negative reviews were provided.

Students praise the outstanding quality of courses, inspiring faculty, and supportive learning environment. Practical and theoretical curriculum, along with opportunities to connect with professionals, are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was reported.

With one review averaging 5/5 stars, ~100% of feedback is positive. The single positive review highlights the university's integrated approach to improving higher education and fostering research.

With one review averaging 5/5, ~100% positive feedback highlights considerate professors and good connections with language schools. New classrooms, foreign lecturers, and scholarships were also noted. No negative feedback was received.