Mary Immaculate College - MIC vs University of Limerick - UL vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Kemmy Business School - KBS
Side-by-side comparison from 126 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Close-knit community and personal lecturer relationships
- +Strong sense of togetherness and unity among students
- +Excellent teaching programs and student support
- +Practical skills and career preparation
- +Supportive and friendly academic staff and community
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Practical, industry-relevant programmes
- +International environment and global opportunities
- +Inspiring professors and strong teaching quality
- +Expert faculty and supportive environment
- +Modern facilities and accommodation
- +Supportive guidance throughout the student journey
- +Practical, skill-focused education with industry-experienced professors
- +Affordable programs and welcoming community atmosphere
- +Supportive and accessible faculty
- +Well-structured and accommodating courses
- +Welcoming and convenient campus environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and responsiveness from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of career guidance and irrelevant research suggestions from faculty.
- -Poor quality of education and facilities not worth the cost.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Mediocre teaching and perceived lack of educational value.
- -The institution feels like a money-making scheme rather than a place of learning.
- -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication and transparency are lacking from leadership.
- -Lack of essential university facilities and student support services
- -Poor teaching quality and insufficient practical application
- -Inadequate building maintenance and uncomfortable conditions
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Ineffective administrative and management practices cause frustration.
- -Lack of student support and career services is a significant concern.
This institution shows a stark contrast in its ratings. It excels significantly in **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its **Internationality** is a clear weak point, scoring only one. Facilities, Location, and Student Life also received low marks, indicating areas for considerable improvement. Accommodations sit in the middle with a moderate rating.
Analysis of university ratings reveals a generally positive reception. The strongest area is **Value** (4.32), closely followed by **Professors** (4.28) and **Student Life** (4.23). **Accommodations** stand out as the weakest point, receiving the lowest rating at 3.94. Other categories like Facilities and Internationality also scored well above average.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
This university achieves excellent scores in its facilities and internationality, both receiving a 4.22 rating. Professors are also highly regarded with a 4.11 score. Value for money is rated a solid 4. The weakest areas appear to be student life and accommodation, with ratings of 3.78 and 3.75 respectively, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates a consistent and strong performance. Each aspect, from facilities and professors to student life and internationality, has earned a rating of 4. The university excels uniformly, with no single area standing out significantly above others, nor any area identified as a weakness. Its balanced approach suggests a well-rounded educational experience.
Academic and international aspects of the university are highly praised, with Professors and Internationality both receiving a strong 4.29 rating. Location also scores well at 4.17. The university's weakest area is Accomodation, which received a lower score of 2.88. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strengths.
This university presents a generally positive profile, with particularly strong ratings for its professors at 4.5. Other highly-rated aspects include facilities, student life, accommodation, and internationality, all scoring a solid 4. The location is the weakest area, receiving a 3.5 rating, though overall value is also rated favorably at 4.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~75%), highlighting a strong sense of community, close lecturer-student relationships, and excellent teaching. Some mention the college's compact size and limited on-site facilities.
With an average rating of 4.24/5, approximately 99% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent facilities, practical skills, and a vibrant learning atmosphere. A single negative review mentioned concerns about career prospects and faculty motivation.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
About 78% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic and professional growth, practical application of knowledge, and an international environment. A single negative review criticized the institution as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews praise the vibrant academic community, state-of-the-art amenities, and expert faculty. ~100% of feedback is positive, with no negative reviews recorded.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive guidance, practical learning, and friendly staff. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions a lack of facilities and career support.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, ~0% negative feedback indicates a highly positive student experience. Students praise the welcoming atmosphere, easy navigation of classes and campus, and friendly student-friendly location. Responsiveness of staff and well-structured courses are also highlighted.
Nothing to show
I am currently studying a Masters in International Entrepreneurship Management this programme develops entrepreneurial creativity, awareness and specialist knowledge to help establish, manage and grow innovative new ventures across a variety of industry settings, incorporating a range of in-company projects to give ‘real world’ experience. Participants explore their own entrepreneurial potential and prepare an investor-ready business plan. I have always wanted to start my own business and this programme equipped me with the tools and skills to do this. Throughout the programme, we were able to work with real-life businesses and consult for them on a regular basis. For example in a module called international business consulting we worked for one of the biggest PPE distributors in the EU. We developed a market entry strategy for the company Irema and outlined how they could advance into the US market. Furthermore, for the final year project, we had to work with a small enterprise and establish a two-year commercialisation plan for them. This was really great fun and gave a practical experience that you wouldn’t be able to get in any other programme.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
