EU Business School vs Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich - LMU vs Technical University of Munich - TUM vs Munich Business School - MBS vs Macromedia University of Applied Sciences

Side-by-side comparison from 453 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
EU Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich - LMU: wins 1/7 categories
Technical University of Munich - TUM: wins 0/7 categories
Munich Business School - MBS: wins 0/7 categories
Macromedia University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
Hochschule Fresenius: wins 1/7 categories
TUM School of Management: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
3.80
Read more reviews
231 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Biology
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Communication and Media Studies
Idstein, Germany
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Economics
Best programme: Accounting
Category ratings
Facilities
4.06
4.30
4.21
4.17
3.67
3.67
4.67
Win
Location
4.69
4.18
4.18
4.25
4.33
5.00
Win
4.33
Professors
4.01
4.17
4.09
4.19
4.00
4.00
4.33
Win
Internationality
4.71
Win
4.22
4.29
4.24
4.67
3.67
4.33
Student life
4.23
4.20
3.92
4.29
3.67
3.33
4.33
Win
Value
3.87
4.24
4.19
4.16
3.00
4.00
4.33
Win
Accommodation
3.50
4.04
Win
3.76
3.97
3.00
3.00
3.67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert professors with real-world insights
  • +International and diverse student community
  • +Practical and engaging learning experiences
  • +Strong academic programs with high-quality teaching and practical experience
  • +Valuable international environment and diverse study options
  • +Excellent value with zero tuition fees and research opportunities
  • +Diverse and customizable specialization options
  • +High academic standards and strong career prospects
  • +Excellent support for international students
  • +Practical, real-world preparation and career readiness.
  • +International perspective and global network development.
  • +Supportive community, dedicated faculty, and networking opportunities.
  • +Broadened horizons and excellent networking
  • +Valuable real-world experience through company work
  • +Supportive and understanding staff
  • +Relevant and varied course content
  • +Helpful and educated faculty
  • +Supportive university staff
  • +Practice-oriented courses and strong industry collaboration
  • +Supportive and motivating instructors
  • +Small class sizes and personalized attention
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Educational quality and resources are perceived as basic and lacking.
  • -Poor support for extracurricular activities and issues with accreditation are noted.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of course relevance are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder student progress and fair assessment.
  • -Outdated facilities and inefficient systems create frustrating learning environments.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of support and poor communication from staff are recurring problems.
  • -Poor quality of education and lecturer qualifications.
  • -High tuition fees disproportionate to class availability and contact hours.
  • -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Ineffective and outdated course content and teaching methods are a major concern.
  • -Poorly managed administrative processes and lack of support are frequently criticized.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This university exhibits notable strengths in its Internationality and Location, both scoring very highly. Student Life and Facilities also received positive marks. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. The University's Professors and Value fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This university garners strong feedback across most aspects. Its highest-rated category is Facilities, closely followed by Value and Internationality. Student Life also receives positive scores. The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Accomodation. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and appealing environment for its students.

A notable range of scores characterizes this university's performance. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, reflecting a high degree of global engagement. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest rating, suggesting this may be an area for improvement. Other categories like Facilities, Location, and Value also scored very well, indicating a generally positive university experience. Student Life and Professors also maintained respectable scores.

This institution receives high marks across most aspects of the student experience. Location and Student Life are particularly strong, both exceeding a 4.2 rating. Internationality also scores very well. The primary area for improvement seems to be Accommodation, which has the lowest rating at just under 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, and Value, are consistently rated above 4.1.

Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, earning a high score. Strong performance is also noted for **Location** and **Professors**. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** received the lowest ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement.

With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.

This university receives particularly strong ratings in its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.67. Other well-regarded aspects include **professors**, **location**, **student life**, **internationality**, and **value**, all scoring a solid 4.33. The lowest-rated area is **accommodation**, with a score of 3.67, indicating room for improvement in this specific category.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, practical insights, and an international environment. A smaller portion (~7.8%) expresses concerns about disorganization and educational quality.

Nearly all of the 48 reviews are positive, reflecting a high average rating of 4.06/5. Students praise academic quality, practical project experience, international environment, and program flexibility. No negative reviews were submitted.

With an average rating of 4.07/5 from 100 reviews, ~95% of students are positive. They highlight diverse specializations, high academic standards leading to good job prospects, and excellent professor support. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned overlapping course schedules.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93%), highlighting well-structured programs, supportive environments, and strong career preparation. Students appreciate the international perspective, networking opportunities, and practical teaching approaches. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 3/5 from three reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is negative. Students cite concerns about academic quality and value for money. One positive review highlighted broad horizons and networking opportunities.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.

With a 4.33/5 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight high-quality, practice-oriented courses, strong industry collaboration, and dedicated instructors. Some note large student numbers and limited staff as minor drawbacks.

Rating distribution
5★
25%
8%
15%
15%
33%
33%
33%
4★
46%
90%
80%
78%
0%
67%
67%
3★
22%
2%
3%
6%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
1%
0%
67%
0%
0%
1★
4%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Professor and teaching style

Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.

Up to date equipment

There are superior facilities at the FH Aachen. The tutorial halls and classes are sophisticated, equipped with the the current and innovative equipment, and the library is large and well-stocked. To guarantee that students have a positive college experience, the educational facility also offers a range of extracurricular activities and events.

Nothing to show

Great University in an Awesome City

I studied for 4 months in MBS (I did my Erasmus there) and I have nothing but good and kind words for this place. Their methodology is much different than what I was used to in Barcelona: all the classes were practical, with little or none theory explained and everything explained through real-case scenarios or simulations. The fact that the teachers were, most of the times, business men and women that where working part-time as teachers, allowed students to learn current hot topics that were trending on some kinds of industry. Some of the subjects have no exams and instead they have a final project (for example, International Business Project of HR Management) that has to be done in groups, allowing yourself to develop teambuilding and teamworking skills. Also, the fact that classes are quite small allow for a better teacher-student communication. Other than that, the Erasmus Programme of this university is quite recognized worldwide, making students not just from Europe, but from the world, to go to study in MBS. The variety of cultures and people that you meet allow for a more, better open-minded way of thinking. Something I would recommend: International Business Project class and HR Management. Also, German can be learned in different levels according to your skills. Something that I did not like that much: the wifi was quite slow and it was hard to connect to sometimes. Hope they have improved it!

Nothing to show

Well structured course

Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close