Bocconi University vs The University of Milan - UniMi vs POLIMI Graduate School of Management vs Sustainability Management School - SUMAS vs Humanitas University - HU
Side-by-side comparison from 223 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong marketing & business programmes with specialized, updated courses.
- +Excellent, qualified instructors with industry links and hands-on learning.
- +Excellent professional opportunities and supportive, efficient university structure.
- +Flexible study options and strong academic support
- +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers with engaging teaching
- +Dynamic environment and integrated theory with practical application
- +Innovative and forward-looking curriculum
- +Strong career development and industry connections
- +Flexible and student-friendly learning environment
- +High-quality teaching and supportive instructors.
- +Excellent career services and networking opportunities.
- +Engaging campus life and diverse student community.
- +International focus and English-taught programs
- +Excellent facilities and proximity to research hospital
- +Strong career prospects and innovative programs
Nothing to show
- +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
- +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent and frustrating.
- -The educational approach emphasizes rote memorization and lacks practical application.
- -Facilities are limited and outdated, with poor course materials and inflexible schedules.
- -Overcrowded courses and chaotic scheduling impede learning.
- -Outdated facilities limit access to essential resources.
- -Excessive administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of practical application and unclear curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Lack of transparency and poor communication are recurring problems.
- -Unprofessionalism and unresponsiveness from staff are highly criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support for students are disliked.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
This university generally receives positive feedback from students. Its strongest areas are Value and Location, both scoring over 4.3. Student Life and Facilities are also well-regarded. However, Accomodation and Internationality are the lowest-rated categories, falling below 4.0.
An analysis of university ratings reveals a strong performance in its **Location**, achieving the highest score. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, with the lowest rating. Other categories such as Professors and Value also received favorable scores, while Facilities and Student Life were rated moderately well. The university also demonstrates good performance in Internationality.
The university scores exceptionally well in Student Life and Internationality, both receiving perfect marks. Its Facilities and Value also stand out with strong ratings of 4.5. Professors and Location are solid at 4.0. The lowest-rated area is Accomodation, with a score of 3.5. This indicates a positive overall experience, particularly for social engagement and global integration.
This institution excels in its **Internationality**, earning a high rating of 4.5. However, significant weaknesses are evident in **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, both receiving the lowest score of 1. **Facilities** and **Value** also present areas for improvement with ratings of 1.5. While **Professors** scored moderately at 3, the university's **Location** also received a middling 2.5.
This institution garners considerable praise for its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.6. Student life and overall value are also well-regarded, with scores of 4.2. Areas for potential improvement lie in **Accomodation** and **Location**, which received lower ratings of 3.6 and 3.8 respectively. Professors are rated favorably at 4.
Nothing to show
This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.
Nearly all (~96%) reviews are positive, highlighting excellent courses, qualified instructors, and professional opportunities. A small percentage (~4%) of negative feedback mentions administrative issues and outdated teaching methods.
Approximately 78 out of 101 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.02/5. Students praise the dynamic environment, collaborative professors, and good organization. A small percentage of feedback was negative.
All reviews are positive, with students praising the program's focus on finance technology, career prospects, and the supportive, organized learning environment. The university is described as flexible and student-friendly.
Both university reviews are negative, rating it 1/5. Recurring themes include administrative issues, unresponsiveness, and unprofessional management, leading to a strong negative sentiment (~100% of feedback).
With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are positive, highlighting innovative programs and good facilities. Some mention an intense workload and occasional disorganization.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.
I love the quality of education I received at Bocconi. Having previously studied Management back in Turkey, coming here to do my masters in Marketing Management allowed me to get much more specialisation regarding my field. I got to know more about the data side of marketing, which brought me a whole other perspective. The school itself has many opportunities to make your university life the best possible experience. I enjoyed the seminars held, the extracurricular activities carried out, the opportunities to join an association, and have also been staying in one of the residences of Bocconi, which has made my life so much easier. Overall, I can say that both in terms of the education I got and the campus life Bocconi provided me, I am very satisfied with everything.
What makes my university special? The people. At the University of Milan, you are not just a student number - you are part of a supportive community that genuinely wants you to succeed. They have every resource imaginable to help you get through that graduation phase. From the beautiful campus (seriously, it is breathtaking) to the warm and welcoming atmosphere, every day here is rewarding. The classes actually make you want to participate, and the professors go above and beyond to make learning exciting. I wouldn't trade my experience here for anything in the world.
The program offers great technological and concrete competencies of the technology applied to the financial sector. Students are highly motivated and fun to be around. The courses are highly linked to innovative and forward-looking topics and deliver great career prospects.
I am a recent graduate of this university and overall, I would not recommend this university to anyone looking to continue their education. Many of my classmates and I had consistent issues with the administration that hindered our learning and dampened our experience. When we tried to propose changes or discuss problems, the administration was not open to working with us. Response times were lengthy and grading was subjective, with no true transparency into how they were determined. This made many of us afraid to speak up, which is why I am doing so now, after I have secured my diploma today. The biggest disappointment for me was the lack of career services. Since this was heavily marketed to me when I was considering this school, I was shocked to learn there is no career office, no career fairs, and no real effort to connect students with alumni who could help us advance our careers. When I approached the administration about the career fair issue, they claimed that career fairs were only possible with the help of student council and that no students had run for a position this year. This was shocking news to me since the school did not hold an Autumn student council election and the Spring election took place less than 2 months before 21 of the 23 students were graduating, thus students would not have been able to make any real change in their remaining time. In my time at SUMAS I did learn a lot and was fortunate to have some great professors who equipped me with knowledge and tools for my career, and I am grateful to them. However, the quality of the education does not outweigh all of the issues we experienced which is why I do not recommend this school to others. ** carefully read their accreditation because they are not accredited by any of the big accreditation organizations that are widely recognized
Personally, I am quite happy with my choice to come to study at Humanitas University and would do so again if I had to. It is by no means a perfect university, it is currently going through some 'growing pains' that result in disorganization, some professors are better than others, etc. However, it's a new university that is growing, the hospital is right next to it, the facilities are new and excellent, there is a lot of support for international students, etc. In my opinion, the pros heavily outweigh the cons.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
